Teams

*13-RGildehaus-YMCA-40

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-29vs *3-SRyan-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Holub / Ed Holub vs Gary Glish / Richard Henderson0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-15vs *5-TBarfield-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Holub / Ed Holub vs Robert Hutchins / Brice Englert3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-08vs *2-JLockhead-HRWon 20
W#2 DoublesCharlie Foster / Edward Bernier vs Richard Griffin / Neil McElroy7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEd Holub / John Nealis vs Chris Sansone / Greg Fitts6-1, 6-2
2024-04-01vs *6-KRosenkrantz-CHTCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEd Holub / Charlie Foster vs Richard Goldberg / James Bohanek6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEdward Bernier / Henry Pereira vs Robert Kern / Mark Thomsen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-25vs *7-TPetersen-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Holub / Ed Holub vs JEFF CHANDLER / Adam Lang6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Bernier / Chris Johnson vs George Corbett / Michael Klein6-0, 6-0
2024-03-11vs *10-MSears-DFCWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Holub / Edward Bernier vs Daniel Ennis / Brian Murray6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
3.64
John Nealis
published
3.53
Charles Gordon
published 3.5
3.49
Ed Holub
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.44
Ryan Goff
published
3.39
David Holub
published 3.5
3.30
Edward Bernier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
published
2.83
Ricky Ayers
published
Justin Bryant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Holub + David Holub5166% games+11.5% vs expected
Ryan Goff + Charles Gordon2743% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Green
29W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
John Nealis
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Charles Gordon
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Ed Holub
78W–28L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Ryan Goff
14W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
David Holub
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Edward Bernier
164W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Ralph Gildehaus
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
Ricky Ayers
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Christopher DeFusco
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Justin Bryant
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.