Teams

Sarasota/Rose/18&Over8.5W

2023 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Fall Weekend · 8.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.29 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Rose / Lisa Temple vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-12vs Payne Park It's Just TennisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichele Rose / Donna Mink vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Hillock / Agnes Toth vs Fabiola Beckmann / Haley English7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-04vs Payne Park WilsonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDonna Mink / Livia Alcantara vs Nancy Finman / Denise Holland5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWendy Hillock / Tracy Fang vs Sally Alford / Kara Beene6-1, 6-3
2023-10-21vs Payne Park WilsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Rose / Donna Mink vs Sue Green / Susan Gammon4-6, 4-6
2023-10-14vs Payne Park It's Just TennisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Sims / Lisa Temple vs Paradise Traub / Fabiola Beckmann1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAgnes Toth / Donna Mink vs Marcia Frost / Kinsey Robb6-4, 6-2
2023-09-30vs Payne Park WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesPat Brugger / Wendy Hillock vs Tami Dalto / Yudi Carpenter7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Colleen Sims
published 4.5
4.24
Cindy Fancher
published 4.5
4.20
Tracy Fang
published
4.10
Pat Brugger
published 4.5
4.03
Michele Rose
published
3.95
Wendy Hillock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Melissa Caldwell
published
3.76
Donna Mink
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Temple
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Ann Davy
published 4
3.59
Michelle McGrath
published
Renelle Lim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Fancher + Pat Brugger3447% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Hillock + Cindy Fancher5157% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Temple + Melissa Caldwell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colleen Sims
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Cindy Fancher
68W–71L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.24
Tracy Fang
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Pat Brugger
58W–37L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Wendy Hillock
92W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.95
Melissa Caldwell
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Donna Mink
107W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Lisa Temple
83W–78L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Ann Davy
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
Michelle McGrath
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Renelle Lim
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.