Teams

Magic Volley

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - MAGIC VALLEY · Mixed 7.0 - MIXED 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-06vs Mixed BlessingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Levings / Roy Prescott vs Jennifer Preucil / Jeff McCall6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJamie King / Greg Chylewski vs Jena Clayville / David Miller1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShana Hoge / Benanthony De La Rosa vs Richard Keck / Elizabeth Lassen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-08-04vs Mixed BlessingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Levings / Benanthony De La Rosa vs Jena Clayville / Richard Keck2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShana Hoge / Randall Largent vs Lana Penrose / Michael Zigich7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Greg Chylewski vs Amy Bearden / Jeff McCall7-5, 6-1
2026-07-30vs Mixed BlessingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesRandall Largent / Jamie King vs David Miller / Jena Clayville6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBenanthony De La Rosa / Nicole Rowley vs Daniel Friend / Amy Bearden7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJim Opie / Jennifer Vargo vs Michael Zigich / Elizabeth Lassen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Mixed BlessingsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Vargo / Randall Largent vs Richard Keck / Jena Clayville1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Levings / Jim Opie vs David Miller / Lana Penrose6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Greg Chylewski vs Jennifer Preucil / Jeff McCall3-6, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Mixed BlessingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesBenanthony De La Rosa / Cynthia Levings vs Daniel Friend / Elizabeth Lassen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGreg Chylewski / Nicole Rowley vs Richard Keck / Jena Clayville1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJim Opie / Jennifer Vargo vs Jeff McCall / Amy Bearden6-1, 6-1
2026-07-21vs Mixed BlessingsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJamie King / Randall Largent vs David Miller / Jena Clayville6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRoy Prescott / Cynthia Levings vs Lana Penrose / Richard Keck4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShana Hoge / Greg Chylewski vs Daniel Friend / Amy Bearden2-6, 4-6
2026-07-14vs Mixed BlessingsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie King / Benanthony De La Rosa vs Jennifer Preucil / Michael Zigich6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Graf / Randall Largent vs Jena Clayville / Richard Keck4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Rowley / Roy Prescott vs Lana Penrose / Jeff McCall7-5, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 7.0 - MIXED 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Cynthia Levings
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.36
Jennifer Vargo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Greg Chylewski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Randall Largent
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Nicole Rowley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jamie King
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Shana Hoge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Judy Graf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Benanthony De La Rosa
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Roy Prescott
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Jim Opie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Opie + Jennifer Vargo2941% gamesnot enough data
Judy Graf + Randall Largent3349% gamesnot enough data
Greg Chylewski + Cynthia Levings3253% gamesnot enough data
Benanthony De La Rosa + Shana Hoge224 matchesnot enough data
Judy Graf + Greg Chylewski213 matchesnot enough data
Judy Graf + Roy Prescott213 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Rowley + Greg Chylewski123 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Rowley + Benanthony De La Rosa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Levings
39W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jennifer Vargo
43W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Greg Chylewski
15W–35L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Randall Largent
19W–21L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Nicole Rowley
18W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jamie King
31W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Shana Hoge
17W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Judy Graf
97W–76L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Benanthony De La Rosa
23W–10L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Roy Prescott
12W–22L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Jim Opie
3W–25L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.