Teams

Rockledge - Melendez

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs Fee - HeynLost 02
L#1 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Jeannette Cintron vs Keiko Edwards / Susan Deschaine4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarie Forte / Kaitlin Stahl vs Sarah Brown / Sandra Edwards2-6, 0-6
2022-06-16vs Kiwi - RamseyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Marie Forte vs Barbara Burgess / Karen Fitzmaurice3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Hastings / Miriam Melendez vs Tina Murphy / Christina Kopp2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaitlin Stahl / Donna Paternoster vs Stephanie Pellegrino / Cynthia Huss4-6, 3-6
2022-06-13vs Brevard - Suntree / McLaughlinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Jeannette Cintron vs Mary Ehrhard / Jennifer Ledene6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaitlin Stahl vs Christina Carver2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Sherry Houston vs Ann Passmore / Sandra Rowe6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Peyton Shedrick vs Nancy Charitat / Kiana Zanganeh4-6, 2-6
2022-05-16vs TTC- UrbanLost 12
L#1 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Jeannette Cintron vs Mary Beardall / Katharine Polvino5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMiriam Melendez / Nancy Hastings vs Mei Kalman / Phyllis O'Toole6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Kaitlin Stahl vs Heather Harris / Michelle Ruether4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-13vs Fee - HeynWon 40
W#1 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Sherry Houston vs Janis Mena / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Stahl vs Gena Wools6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrenda Knox / Peyton Shedrick vs Susan Deschaine / Michele Heyn7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMiriam Melendez / Nancy Hastings vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-02vs Brevard - Suntree / McLaughlinLost 13
W#1 DoublesSherry Houston / Naomi Coleman vs Sharon Bean / Michelle Salazar7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaitlin Stahl vs Christina Carver1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeannette Cintron / Miriam Melendez vs Jennifer Ledene / Sandra Rowe3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Forte / Nancy Hastings vs Ann Passmore / Unsuk Hurst1-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs Kiwi - RamseyWon 31
W#1 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Peyton Shedrick vs Christina Kopp / Anne Ramsey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Stahl vs Janaina Minamyer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarie Forte / Nancy Hastings vs Tina Murphy / Betty Schaub7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeth Sidor / Arletha White vs Leesa Brambach / Tracey Draper1-6, 1-6
2022-04-11vs TTC- UrbanLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherry Houston / Naomi Coleman vs Amy McIntosh / Katharine Polvino4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Paternoster / Kaitlin Stahl vs Mei Kalman / Phyllis O'Toole7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kube / Brenda Knox vs Michelle Ruether / Nicole Bertran6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Naomi Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Donna Paternoster
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Gisela Alcalde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kaitlin Stahl
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Suzanne Kube
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Sherry Houston
published
2.87
Nancy Hastings
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Miriam Melendez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.74
Arletha White
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Brenda Knox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeannette Cintron
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Peyton Shedrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannette Cintron + Gisela Alcalde101151% games+3.4% vs expected
Miriam Melendez + Suzanne Kube4443% games−9.2% vs expected
Arletha White + Suzanne Kube9852% gamesnot enough data
Arletha White + Gisela Alcalde8655% gamesnot enough data
Brenda Knox + Donna Paternoster3845% gamesnot enough data
Arletha White + Nancy Hastings7451% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Hastings + Miriam Melendez4747% gamesnot enough data
Naomi Coleman + Gisela Alcalde7257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Naomi Coleman
170W–144L career · 9 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Donna Paternoster
82W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Gisela Alcalde
268W–176L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Kaitlin Stahl
71W–27L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Suzanne Kube
117W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Sherry Houston
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Nancy Hastings
108W–120L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3.5
Miriam Melendez
47W–85L career · 4 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
3
Arletha White
108W–132L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Brenda Knox
45W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Jeannette Cintron
81W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peyton Shedrick
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.