Teams

Patterson/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - TUE AM

14 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-22vs Collins/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesStephanie Nelson / Thalia Kahl vs Holly Baumgartner / Christie Harrison4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNancy Preston vs Beth Gottlieb3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSara Baker / Patti Pittman vs Nicole Keenan / Jennifer Comegna3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSara Gibbs vs Lindsay Bentley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKimberly Jones / Gaye Lowe vs Dina Sjursen / Jill Byrum6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-19vs Bateman/Wilke/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesSara Baker / Sara Gibbs vs Gillian Stewart / Lauren Hocker6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHolly Fisher vs Grace Bryan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Patterson / Samantha Santilli vs Ally Bateman / Morgan Williamson4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesVesna Pavlovic vs Carey Peek5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLesly Todesco / Patti Pittman vs Sara Beth Scott / Lauren Kingman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Bateman/Wilke/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSamantha Santilli / Sara Gibbs vs Kailey Dickerson / Katherine Church2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Fisher vs Carey Peek5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSuzy Simpson / Patti Pittman vs Ally Bateman / Grace Bryan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Russell / Nancy Preston vs Susannah MacMillan / Erin Hunter6-1, 6-3
2025-03-04vs Collins/NashvilleLost 12
W#2 DoublesThalia Kahl / Susan Manley vs Mary Powers / Nicki Robins6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHolly Fisher vs Erica Collins0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarian Vangeli / Lesly Todesco vs Mary Glennon / Holly Baumgartner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - TUE AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sara Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.39
Sara Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Suzy Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Susan Manley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Marian Vangeli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Nancy Russell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Vesna Pavlovic
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.20
Gaye Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Samantha Santilli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Lesly Todesco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Holly Fisher
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Patti Pittman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Nancy Preston
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Baker + Sara Gibbs9652% games+5.2% vs expected
Marian Vangeli + Susan Manley4945% games−4.7% vs expected
Lesly Todesco + Susan Manley1636% games−8.1% vs expected
Marian Vangeli + Lesly Todesco0539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Gibbs
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Sara Baker
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Thalia Kahl
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Suzy Simpson
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Susan Manley
26W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Marian Vangeli
19W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Nancy Russell
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Vesna Pavlovic
36W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Gaye Lowe
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Samantha Santilli
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lesly Todesco
11W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Holly Fisher
40W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Patti Pittman
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Nancy Preston
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.