Teams

WSC-Lash

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-31vs BETC-HigashiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacey Roehrs / Ioan Smintina vs Roy Higashi / Val Higashi7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJim Sternberg / Carrie Toppano vs Valarie Kaye / Roger Risch5-7, 4-6
2022-07-16vs CAC/SL-Whole Lotta Love-CareyLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Lash / Siobhan Whitney vs Douglas Gordon / Kim Carey4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Robarge / Stacey Roehrs vs Kevin McMahan / Emilie Purhar4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPetrus Wong / Annelies Smith vs Tony Carey / Charlotte Carey4-6, 4-6
2022-07-03vs CP-Double Trouble-ChiangWon 21
L#1 DoublesYoon Joo Han / John Robarge vs Kelly Chiang / Phillip Lu2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSiobhan Whitney / Tom Lash vs Shelly Enstrom / Mark Enstrom6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStacey Roehrs / Petrus Wong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-26vs PL-Swingers-WoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Lash / Siobhan Whitney vs Cheryl Breining / Peter Breining1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHans Lund / Shawn Thornsberry vs Jill Snow / Gregory Snow4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPetrus Wong / Stacey Roehrs vs Brad Campbell / Tami DeVita2-6, 2-6
2022-06-17vs FC-PinkertonLost 12
W#1 DoublesShawn Thornsberry / Ioan Smintina vs David Mersereau / Jane Shively6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnnelies Smith / Petrus Wong vs Jack Hooper / Jill LaRosa2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSiobhan Whitney / Tom Lash vs Thomas Stave / Homa Assefi4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CAC/SL-Whole Lotta Love-Carey601626105
2PL-Swingers-Wood5112615130
3BETC-Higashi339920159
4CP-Double Trouble-Chiang3371124179
5FC-Pinkerton2471125186
6AYTC (OUTDOORS) Rayburn1581022151
7WSC-Lash1541428179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ioan Smintina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lisa Muzzy
published 3.5
3.17
Siobhan Whitney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Petrus Wong
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Annelies Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Stacey Roehrs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
DAVID MATYAS
published 3
2.20
Carrie Toppano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.94
Tom Lash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jim Sternberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
John Robarge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shawn Thornsberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Lash + Siobhan Whitney134 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Toppano + Jim Sternberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ioan Smintina
83W–83L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Lisa Muzzy
38W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Siobhan Whitney
75W–113L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Petrus Wong
8W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Annelies Smith
50W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Stacey Roehrs
76W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
DAVID MATYAS
49W–81L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Carrie Toppano
61W–88L career · 1 line in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Tom Lash
44W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.94
0
Jim Sternberg
65W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
John Robarge
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Shawn Thornsberry
63W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.