Teams

Ch.Hochstrasser40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-19vs Li.McDermott40ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Diana Kennedy vs Lisa McDermott / Laurie Holderness3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNiezle Scott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Bruner / Mary Hellner vs Kristin Upchurch / Monica Gardner3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Austin / Catherine Chavez vs Christy Sandy / Vaishali Ratia1-6, 4-6
2026-05-12vs Je.SagalSolomon40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / April Lyon vs Marilyn Gordian / Michele Nowicki7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeather Hofmann vs Julia Wade3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAmber Bruner / Garnett Webb vs Lori Sykes / Catherine Langlois6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Hellner / Marjorie Diaz vs Amy Peters / Laura Yates6-1, 6-2
2026-05-05vs Ki.Lamb40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Niezle Scott vs Lindsay Bass / Cassy Albertson5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Hofmann vs Lisa Merritt6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Garnett Webb vs Jeannette Walker / Kimberly Lamb3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Austin / Catherine Chavez vs Dana Eaves / Teri Wallace6-2, 6-4
2026-04-21vs An.Redmond40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Heather Hofmann vs Jorgelina Stroud / Suzanne Ruggles4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNiezle Scott vs Monika Ahmad6-0, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner vs Dawn Johnstone / Abigail Weaver1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Diana Kennedy vs Heath Hilliker / Gina Hartness2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-14vs As.Walker40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesDiana Kennedy / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Catherine Bray / Katherine Seawell-Lewis6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Hofmann vs Griffin Lamb2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb vs Theresa Critcher / Jennifer Guy2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Chavez / Rebecca Glendy vs Alice Touchette / Elena Ryzhikova0-6, 2-6
2026-04-08vs Hop.Pflaum40ALost 13
L#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb vs Melanie Waldron / LaDonna Lee5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Hofmann vs Patty Wroblewski3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiana Kennedy / McGavock Edwards vs Linda Nuxoll / Wendie Hill6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNiezle Scott / Rebecca Glendy vs Hope Pflaum / Stacy Grose7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-07vs As.Grantham40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Kennedy / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Kimberly Lamm / Stephanie Testa6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner vs Susie Albion / Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-17vs Am.Ray40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Louise Hutchinson / Kimberlei Gill4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Hofmann vs Ginger Scanlon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Austin / Amber Bruner vs Donna Driscoll / Amie Ray4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner vs Carol Abercrombie / Louella Venable6-2, 6-4
2026-03-11vs Ca.Grimes40AWon 31
W#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Heather Hofmann vs Emily Best / Charlotte Kopp6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNiezle Scott vs Julia Bethune4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Kennedy / McGavock Edwards vs Elie Foy / Carter Grimes7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine Chavez / Amber Bruner vs Wurth Drummond / Katie Wellman1-6, 1-6
2026-03-03vs Am.Koch40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesGarnett Webb / Rebecca Glendy vs Corinna Proctor / Stacey Winkelspecht0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Hofmann / April Lyon vs Katherine Jackson / Allison Dugan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarjorie Diaz / Lisa Austin vs Kathan Griscik / Zsuzsa Wahlen6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings38 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Er.Hemminger40A10035518256
2As.Walker40A9134613204
3An.Redmond40A91271329293
4Je.Komes40A3.082281228275
5Kr.Gilreath40A3.082291129286
6Hop.Pflaum40A82281231303
7Sa.Kane40A82271331272
8Zo.Whitesell40A7024412165
9Cl.Duff40A7024415203
10Ca.Grimes40A73231736282
11Th.Roschel40A64231739337
12Ch.Hochstrasser40A64182250358
13Ju.Liddle40A5220818188
14Je.Wolborsky40A3.052181025241
15Ki.Meeker40A52151327221
16Li.McDermott40A55241637314
17Sh.Clarkson40A43161229254
18Ju.Clark40A43161231270
19Ju.Shuey40A43151332275
20Je.SagalSolomon40A46182254406
21La.McRee40A46142655375
22La.Daigle40A34131533267
23Ma.Basil40A34121634244
24Li.Howard40A34121634269
25As.Grantham40A37142656383
26We.Bargoil40A37152556395
27Am.Koch40A37132759406
28Br.Robinson40A37122859401
29Ka.Southern40A25121634273
30Me.Green40A25111738281
31Ch.Mccorquodale40A2591940286
32Mo.Garrell40A28152559416
33Ke.Hurter40A28112961406
34Ki.Lamb40A19112960402
35Ka.Landi40A19112964439
36An.Pershke40A0742450310
37Ki.Roberts40A0732551321
38Am.Ray40A010103066428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Niezle Scott
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.81
Heather Hofmann
usually #1 Singles 54%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
2.80
Garnett Webb
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Amber Bruner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
April Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Mary Hellner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.65
McGavock Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Marjorie Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.56
Christa Hochstrasser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Rebecca Glendy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Hochstrasser + Niezle Scott2346% games−4.3% vs expected
Christa Hochstrasser + Garnett Webb2445% games−4.3% vs expected
Lee Berrios-Smothers + April Lyon1545% gamesnot enough data
Christa Hochstrasser + McGavock Edwards134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Hellner + Marjorie Diaz224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Berrios-Smothers + Christa Hochstrasser123 matchesnot enough data
Christa Hochstrasser + Mary Hellner123 matchesnot enough data
April Lyon + Heather Hofmann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Niezle Scott
39W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Heather Hofmann
6W–8L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Garnett Webb
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Amber Bruner
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
April Lyon
118W–138L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Mary Hellner
55W–63L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
McGavock Edwards
59W–88L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Marjorie Diaz
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Christa Hochstrasser
68W–118L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Rebecca Glendy
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.