Teams

WNCK Drake (ARC S)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40 & O 3.5 Women Tuesday & Friday evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-29vs WNCD Andrews (ARC S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJodi Shainberg / Kelly Gillis vs Kari Hubbard / Stephanie Mason7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCynthia Angelo / Kathryn Drake vs Danielle Andrews / Mindy Nelson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Wiener / Sally Benfer vs Zsuzsanna Brooks / Alice Chen6-3, 6-3
2025-03-25vs WNCD Andrews (ARC S)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJodi Shainberg / Cindy Hile vs Christine Carson / Bethany Smith-Martin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Paterson / Melissa Wright vs Danielle Andrews / Kari Hubbard6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMARY PADGETT / Karen Henson vs Mindy Nelson / Kara Candler6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & O 3.5 Women Tuesday & Friday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kelly Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Jodi Shainberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Emily Paterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Melanie Wiener
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Cynthia Angelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Cindy Hile
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Tricia Lancor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
MARY PADGETT
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
3.22
Sally Benfer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
3.15
Karen Henson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Kathryn Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Hile + Carolyn Marzendorfer4252% games−5.4% vs expected
Emily Paterson + Karen Henson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Gillis
58W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
Jodi Shainberg
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Emily Paterson
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Melanie Wiener
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Cynthia Angelo
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Tricia Lancor
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
MARY PADGETT
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Meridith Elliott Powell
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Sally Benfer
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carolyn Marzendorfer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Karen Henson
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kathryn Drake
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.