Teams

A65 7.0M NC Christman

2026 NEOTA Adult 65 & Over · NEOTA A65&O 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-25vs NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesKent Smith / Timothy Feller vs Steven Sues / Tom McPhillips6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWilliam Davis / Phillip Scandy vs Cary Goldstein / James Trapp6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Kowell / Richard Nagy vs Jeffrey Miller / Michael Crider2-6, 0-6
2026-07-18vs A65 7.0M TP PozzaWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Berger / Joe Zabowski vs Michael Karder / William Fox6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Raffel / Scott Martin vs Dennis Virdo / Timothy Patterson6-2, 6-0
2026-07-11vs A65 7.0M PW LongoriaLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Nagy / Tim Allard vs Bob Nicolay / Ron Smith6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Lockert / Brian Kowell vs Steve Poe / John McGeehan6-7, 1-6
2026-06-27vs NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJack Layne / Richard Nagy vs Jeffrey Miller / James Trapp6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Davis / Philip Christman vs William Mooney / Robert Flacks1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKent Smith / Timothy Feller vs Chuck Roman / Philip Dubsky2-6, 2-6
2026-06-20vs A65 7.0M TP PozzaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTimothy Booher / Joe Zabowski vs Tom Pozza / Brent Bowen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdwin Jones / Scott Martin vs Ronald Bassak / Joseph Oriti6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-06-13vs A65 7.0M PW LongoriaWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Allard / Brian Kowell vs Neil Sterba / Steve Poe6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhilip Christman / William Davis vs Terrence Smith / Ron Smith6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEdward Raffel / Timothy Feller vs Mario Massaro / Patrick Tournoux6-1, 6-3
2026-06-06vs NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Christman / Jack Layne vs Robert Flacks / William Mooney6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdward Raffel / Timothy Feller vs James Trapp / Jeffrey Miller3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRichard Nagy / Phillip Scandy vs Philip Dubsky / Chuck Roman0-6, 5-7
2026-05-30vs A65 7.0M TP PozzaWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Berger / Jack Layne vs James Schulte / Ronald Bassak6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKent Smith / Timothy Feller vs Timothy Patterson / Michael Karder6-1, 6-0
2026-05-16vs A65 7.0M PW LongoriaWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhillip Scandy / William Davis vs Steve Hoelzer / Bob Nicolay6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhilip Christman / Timothy Feller vs Patrick Tournoux / Neil Sterba6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdwin Jones / Scott Martin vs Mario Massaro / Terrence Smith4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · NEOTA A65&O 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M9023411164
2A65 7.0M NC Christman54161125198
3A65 7.0M PW Longoria45101735259
4A65 7.0M TP Pozza0952247296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Edwin Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Edward Raffel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Jack Layne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Christopher Berger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Phillip Scandy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Brian Kowell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Timothy Booher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Charles Lockert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joe Zabowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Philip Christman
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Richard Nagy
published
Tim Allard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Timothy Feller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kowell + Charles Lockert4644% gamesnot enough data
Philip Christman + Timothy Feller404 matchesnot enough data
Richard Nagy + Brian Kowell123 matchesnot enough data
Philip Christman + Brian Kowell033 matchesnot enough data
Tim Allard + Charles Lockert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edwin Jones
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Edward Raffel
36W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jack Layne
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Christopher Berger
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
Phillip Scandy
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Kowell
17W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Timothy Booher
87W–91L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Charles Lockert
46W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Joe Zabowski
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Philip Christman
43W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Nagy
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Allard
67W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Feller
11W–2L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.