Teams

LLW SGV Queens of the Court-Fruits-Arroyo Seco/SU4

2022 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesNorma Jean / Eliza Llobrera vs Lily Kurumada / Sophie Chopra6-0, 6-0
2022-05-29vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores - WN/SU 10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLilly Shuton / Shaili Kapoor vs Rebecca Berman / Roxanne Wu4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLilly Shuton vs Christina Bang6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShaili Kapoor / Eliza Llobrera vs Heather Dinger / Ellen Nichols6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIrene Zaragoza / Eliza Llobrera vs Allison Simon / Keum Ko6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCamille Farnsworth / Lilly Shuton vs Rosemary Lee / Maribeth F Rodriguez2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEliza Llobrera / Norma Jean vs Tamara Sobel / Laura Shin6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesLilly Shuton vs Juliette Roberts6-1, 6-0
2022-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesLilly Shuton / Teryl Murphy vs Ellen Nichols / Katelyn Rowe6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Diana Rochford
published 4
3.57
Cristina Padron
published 3.5
3.26
3.15
Makiko Sato
published
3.15
Sanja Morris
published
3.05
Lilly Shuton
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.92
Andrea Fruits
published 3
2.87
Norma Jean
published
2.79
Eliza Llobrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Teryl Murphy
published
2.74
2.72
Irene Zaragoza
published 3
2.65
MacHrie Carroll
published
Veronica Garcia
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Rochford
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
3.5
Cristina Padron
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
Janna Conner-Niclaes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Makiko Sato
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Sanja Morris
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Lilly Shuton
90W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Andrea Fruits
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Norma Jean
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Eliza Llobrera
121W–89L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Teryl Murphy
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Camille Farnsworth
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Irene Zaragoza
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Christina Buckley
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
MacHrie Carroll
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Veronica Garcia
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.