Teams

3-JORegan-HR

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-03vs 2-ACombs-CCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbie McGarrah / Glenda Dinyari vs Thuy Brooks / Carolyn Krisko6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-09vs 1-JMyers-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbie McGarrah / Claire Bassett vs Joli Stockwell / Meghan Burns1-6, 6-7
2024-09-05vs 2-ACombs-CCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbie McGarrah / Claire Bassett vs Thuy Brooks / Carolyn Krisko7-5, 6-1
2024-08-25vs 1-JMyers-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Taub / Barbie McGarrah vs Adrian Davies / Lindsay Roofe Lavin6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Barbie McGarrah
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Lindsey McIver
published 3
Glenda Dinyari
published 3
2.65
Claire Bassett
published 3
2.62
Helen Youngblood
published 3
2.57
Jan ORegan
published
2.56
Jodi Preminger
published
2.52
Mary Hanlon
published
2.49
Nancy Rocamora
published
2.33
Jaclyn Weiser
published
2.25
Regina Kronmiller
published
2.19
Rachel Hawkins
published
Victoria Taub
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Kronmiller + Rachel Hawkins0616% games−24.6% vs expected
Jan ORegan + Rachel Hawkins044 matchesnot enough data
Jan ORegan + Jodi Preminger033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Hanlon + Rachel Hawkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbie McGarrah
82W–65L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Lindsey McIver
44W–36L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Glenda Dinyari
1W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Claire Bassett
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Helen Youngblood
3W–22L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Jan ORegan
10W–34L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
Jodi Preminger
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
Mary Hanlon
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
2.52
Nancy Rocamora
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jaclyn Weiser
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.33
Regina Kronmiller
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.25
Rachel Hawkins
3W–22L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.19
Victoria Taub
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.