Teams

Bartz/Gustafson 40+ ES23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-17vs Toleu: 4.0 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Bartz / Amy Gleason vs Karla Toleu / Sarah Johnson1-6, 3-6
2022-11-03vs Hommeyer/Paper 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Gleason / Kim Bartz vs Susan Hommeyer / Jane Fields2-6, 2-6
2022-10-13vs Toleu: 4.0 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Gleason / Kim Bartz vs Shelley Wagener / Sarah Johnson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Janet Loomis
published
3.64
Jill DeSanto
published
3.45
Amy Gleason
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Douville
published
3.39
Kim Bartz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Jane Casto
published
3.33
Leah Galaudet
published
3.27
Joan Gustafson
published
3.21
Shannon Overdahl
published
3.07
Molly Dymit
published
3.06
Kathy Cima
published
Kathy Buckman
published
Marnie Brown Cress
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Dymit + Shannon Overdahl3649% games+6.2% vs expected
Janet Loomis + Stacey Douville7850% games+1.2% vs expected
Shannon Overdahl + Kathy Cima3942% games−3.9% vs expected
Molly Dymit + Kathy Cima81438% games−7.2% vs expected
Kathy Cima + Joan Gustafson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Loomis
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jill DeSanto
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Amy Gleason
28W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
Stacey Douville
32W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Kim Bartz
117W–122L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
Jane Casto
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Leah Galaudet
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Joan Gustafson
43W–68L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Shannon Overdahl
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Molly Dymit
16W–44L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Kathy Cima
17W–44L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Kathy Buckman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marnie Brown Cress
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.