Teams

LCTA18/Richey/CTC

Combo 18 & Over · Women 9.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-28vs LCTA18/Jain/IndependantLost 02
L#1 DoublesTessa Radziej / Jordan Bowers vs Mary-Wallace DeBerry / Teodora Doncheva1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Faust / Ilaisaane Carter vs Anita Jain / Brenna Feirer3-6, 1-6
2024-10-28vs LCTA18/Kryder/IndependentWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Schuster / Jordan Bowers vs Haley Powell / Alice Kryder6-3, 0-3
L#2 DoublesKimberly Faust / Ilaisaane Carter vs Anna Yates / Ann Harrah1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTessa Radziej / Katie Richey vs Nancy O'Dell-Keim / HELEN BENNETT6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-27vs LLAS UPTA18C/FenigerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJordan Bowers / Samantha Schuster vs Jennifer Milne / Liza Feniger7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTessa Radziej / Katie Richey vs Carol Hayduk / Rhonda Watson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Hughes / Christian Fleming vs Julianne Foster / Michele Jain2-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs LATA18/KWescott/LCTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Schuster / Jordan Bowers vs Staci Jackson / Meghan Polk3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTessa Radziej / Katie Richey vs Madeleine Moore / Elizabeth Holland3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Hughes / Christian Fleming vs Brooke Walter / Kristin Estes2-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs HHTL18/Bailey/ChaplinLost 12
L#1 DoublesIlaisaane Carter / Jordan Bowers vs Katie Ruth / Carolina Lainez1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Schuster / Kimberly Faust vs Kristen Finlen / Rebecca Richison1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Richey / Tessa Radziej vs Jeanne Arlow / Lisa Bailey6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Katie Richey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Kimberly Faust
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Sara Youngner
published
4.06
Tessa Radziej
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.04
Amelia Snyder
published 4.5
3.99
Tijana Subotic
published
3.93
Christian Fleming
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ilaisaane Carter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christian Fleming + Katie Richey4457% games+7.6% vs expected
Sara Youngner + Tijana Subotic8067% games+6.9% vs expected
Tessa Radziej + Katie Richey15755% games+5.5% vs expected
Amelia Snyder + Katie Richey11856% games+4.2% vs expected
Sara Youngner + Kathy Hughes3452% games+3.8% vs expected
Tessa Radziej + Kathy Hughes3350% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Hughes + Christian Fleming033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Richey
45W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Kimberly Faust
61W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Sara Youngner
28W–34L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
Tessa Radziej
39W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
Amelia Snyder
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
Tijana Subotic
67W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Christian Fleming
49W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Ilaisaane Carter
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jordan Bowers
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Hughes
12W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.