Teams

LEECHAR/Campbell/18&over7.0MXD

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 7.0 X Saturday DAY

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesJanet Choisnet / Dan Campbell vs Cheryl Domingo / Wayne Provenza6-2, 6-2
2024-05-18vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherri Campbell / Dan Campbell vs Lillyanna Peniza / Dominick DiGangi6-4, 6-2
2024-04-27vs UTC - RubioLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Choisnet / Dan Campbell vs Leticia Garcia / Greg Freyburgher3-6, 5-7
2024-04-14vs Cypress Lake - JordanWon 10
W#3 DoublesSherri Campbell / Dan Campbell vs Janice Heaphy / Chris Heaphy6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X Saturday DAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Ana Monahan
published 4
3.63
Kim Shotwell
published
3.54
Dan Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.51
Melissa Dorr
published
3.35
Sherri Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.28
Felix Vargas
published 3.5
3.23
Janet Choisnet
published
John Coupe
published
Kerri Coupe
published
Paula Pirruccello
published
Rankin McGougan
published
Scott Shotwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Campbell + Sherri Campbell19957% gamesnot enough data
Paula Pirruccello + Rankin McGougan3251% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Dorr + Felix Vargas224 matchesnot enough data
Sherri Campbell + Rankin McGougan303 matchesnot enough data
Janet Choisnet + Scott Shotwell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Monahan
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Kim Shotwell
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Dan Campbell
123W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Melissa Dorr
25W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sherri Campbell
198W–138L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Felix Vargas
5W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
John Coupe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kerri Coupe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Pirruccello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rankin McGougan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Shotwell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.