Teams

Rovner

2023 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 8.0 W 55 Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-11vs NixonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Mann / Leslie Shipp vs Kim Gillum / Danita Olafson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Marchese / Dawn Ver Steeg vs Pamela Christoffers / Rebecca Studer3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Johnson / Kristen Johansen vs Meg Nixon / Jennifer Clemen6-3, 6-3
2022-12-04vs Bruntz/KrauseWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Leslie Shipp vs Mary Krause / Beth Eganhouse5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Lori Marchese vs Julie Merfeld / Kathleen Hansen3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Johnson / Kristen Johansen vs Sandy Wegner / Kim Stewart6-3, 6-3
2022-11-06vs Bruntz/KrauseWon 30
W#1 DoublesEwa Pratt / Leslie Shipp vs Julie Merfeld / Kathleen Hansen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Karen Mann vs Denise Horner / Connie VanRoekel6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoy Johnson / Janet Johnson vs Debbie Mackaman / Kim Stewart0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-30vs NixonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Leslie Shipp vs Kim Gillum / Danita Olafson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoy Johnson / Janet Johnson vs Meg Nixon / Jennifer Kozlowski6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Jennifer Heil vs Jennifer Clemen / Rebecca Studer2-6, 2-6
2022-10-16vs Bruntz/KrauseWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Mann / Joy Johnson vs Debbie Mackaman / Kathleen Weyers4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Leslie Shipp vs Lynette Brown / Rhonda McCoy6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Ewa Pratt vs Julie Bruntz / Mary Krause1-6, 3-6
2022-10-02vs NixonWon 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Mallaney / Ewa Pratt vs Luann Gilman / Maria Fedorova5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Jennifer Heil vs Jennifer Kozlowski / Kim Gillum6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Mann / Leslie Shipp vs Jennifer Clemen / Pamela Christoffers6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 8.0 W 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rovner6013518162
2IA/Cram/55&Over8.0W4211716147
3Adams/Kron4210820173
4Bruntz/Krause2471122161
5Nixon1571124164
6Hurn/Sherman1561226187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Joy Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Dawn Ver Steeg
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Ewa Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Lori Marchese
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Kristen Johansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Jennifer Heil
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.32
Karen Mann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Leslie Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Liz Mallaney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Johnson + Joy Johnson11358% games+7.2% vs expected
Dawn Ver Steeg + Lori Marchese22364% games+6.3% vs expected
Karen Mann + Joy Johnson5258% games+5.8% vs expected
Liz Mallaney + Lori Marchese10257% games+0.8% vs expected
Leslie Shipp + Dawn Ver Steeg13559% games+0.7% vs expected
Janet Johnson + Kristen Johansen4256% gamesnot enough data
Karen Mann + Leslie Shipp4157% gamesnot enough data
Karen Mann + Dawn Ver Steeg3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Johnson
43W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
4.13
4
Dawn Ver Steeg
76W–30L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Ewa Pratt
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Marchese
40W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
Kristen Johansen
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Heil
87W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Karen Mann
18W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Janet Johnson
31W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Shipp
64W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Liz Mallaney
16W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.