Teams

RAFAEL RC 40AW4.0A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kelly Mcgeehan
published
Alyson Aiello
published 4
3.70
Hayley Burner
published
3.66
Lauren Volpi
published
3.64
Jennifer Rice
published
3.55
Eileen Benson
published
3.53
Margarita Wear
published
3.47
Sharon Klein
published
3.41
Wendy Morgan
published
3.34
Petra Jacobson
published
3.34
Eliza Denitto
published
3.26
Betsy Snyder
published 3.5
3.25
Angela Liu
published 3.5
3.19
Sarah Fonkalsrud
published
3.18
Susan Ginwala
published
3.18
Joanna Brook
published
3.17
Nhat Johnston
published
3.15
Kendal Burrell
published
3.14
Amy Atherton
published 3.5
3.06
Michelle Nardone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Klein + Lauren Volpi4455% games+8.4% vs expected
Sharon Klein + Margarita Wear2739% games−2.5% vs expected
Betsy Snyder + Sarah Fonkalsrud3343% games−12.4% vs expected
Jennifer Rice + Angela Liu2351% gamesnot enough data
Margarita Wear + Lauren Volpi3252% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Morgan + Susan Ginwala314 matchesnot enough data
Kendal Burrell + Eliza Denitto224 matchesnot enough data
Kendal Burrell + Michelle Nardone224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Mcgeehan
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Alyson Aiello
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Hayley Burner
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Lauren Volpi
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
Jennifer Rice
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Eileen Benson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.55
Margarita Wear
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Sharon Klein
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
Wendy Morgan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
Petra Jacobson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Eliza Denitto
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Betsy Snyder
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Angela Liu
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Sarah Fonkalsrud
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Susan Ginwala
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Joanna Brook
14W–23L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nhat Johnston
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kendal Burrell
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Atherton
8W–21L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Michelle Nardone
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.