Teams

Hermitage Blankley

2025 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-23vs MTC Mixed Miracles - MarksLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Blankley / Stephanie Yablonski vs Tracy Marks / Amanda Mayhew1-6, 3-6
2025-06-12vs Avalon Ghita- Mix 40/ 7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Christopher Forstner vs Thomas Leftwich / Jennifer Manring6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Patrick Fagan vs Michele Riedel / Gabriel Ghita6-1, 7-6
2025-06-11vs TDC CarlyleWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Fagan / Stephanie Yablonski vs Brian Dunn / Sheri Carlyle6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.52
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.45
Christopher Forstner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Patrick Fagan
published
3.33
Turner Broughton
published
3.31
ANJA BAUGH
published 3.5
3.30
Rita Ryan
published
3.29
Andrea Broughton
published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Wassmer
published 3.5
3.22
Teki Hall
published
3.00
JR Pruden
published 3
2.87
David Blankley
published 3
2.57
Samuel Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Westman
published
Rob Chesson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Broughton + Turner Broughton6356% games+11.1% vs expected
Stephanie Yablonski + Patrick Fagan7158% games+4.8% vs expected
Kathleen Crotty + David Blankley4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Beth Stinson
28W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Christopher Forstner
32W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
Patrick Fagan
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Turner Broughton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
ANJA BAUGH
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Rita Ryan
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Wassmer
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Teki Hall
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3
JR Pruden
30W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
David Blankley
20W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Samuel Adams
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Mark Westman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Chesson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.