Teams

B1 Hermitage Fisher

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-08vs B10 CCV WherryWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Ted Luse vs Taylor Brannan / Tommy Thompson6-3, 7-6
2023-06-01vs B9 Salisbury RiegelWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Furbee / Andrew Bolyard vs John Spichiger / William Gilbert3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-25vs B8 Burkwood McKelveyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKENJI SAKAMOTO / Todd Furbee vs Tom Newton / Jason Butler7-6, 6-2
2023-05-04vs B5 Avalon McCarty LitesWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Bolyard / Daniel Sadusky vs Stephen Terrell / Barrow Turner6-0, 6-0
2023-04-27vs B4 ACAC HollomonWon 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Sadusky / Andrew Bolyard vs Brian Cooper / Karl Koenig6-2, 7-6
2023-04-20vs B3 Raintree Raghavan RenegadesWon 10
W#2 DoublesWood Gyory / Todd Furbee vs Cory Connell / Theo Prestia7-5, 6-3
2023-04-13vs B2 Ridgetop BlouchWon 10
W#1 DoublesTodd Furbee / KENJI SAKAMOTO vs Robert Wainscott / Charles Wayland6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Todd Furbee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Mac Stuckey
published
3.67
Bryan Fisher
published 4
3.65
Bart Nasta
published 4
3.63
Steve Hamant
published
3.61
Daniel Sadusky
published 4
3.36
Andrew Bolyard
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
YOUNG CHOE
published
Douglas Gray
published
Philip Rackliffe
published
Ted Luse
published
Wood Gyory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mac Stuckey + Bryan Fisher8160% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Todd Furbee
72W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Bryan Fisher
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Bart Nasta
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Steve Hamant
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Andrew Bolyard
126W–78L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
YOUNG CHOE
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Douglas Gray
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Philip Rackliffe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Luse
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wood Gyory
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.