Teams

BBaker (Queens)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-02vs KSalina (PCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDanielle Gier / Sally Licandro vs Michele Messmer / Meg McSherry5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Sison / Allison Purmort vs Elizabeth Suppa / Laurie Eatman6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Larissa Soto6-1, 6-0
2024-04-25vs TCooper/AEagan (WSRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Gier / Sally Licandro vs Tasha Cooper / Victoria Sofarelli4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKara Tringali vs Jurga Petrikis6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany Baker / Allison Purmort vs Amanda Eagan / Stacey Herndon6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-04-22vs AStover/RGrantham (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Sison / Lauren Spanos vs Deepti Dua / Kelly Lull3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKara Tringali / Allison Purmort vs Anita Stewart-Stover / Rachel Grantham6-7, 1-6
2024-04-18vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 12
L#2 DoublesAnna Sison / Spencer Stoakley vs Kim King / Meghan Rawlings2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Tracy McLaughlin6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Gier / Brittany Baker vs Deb Sokol / Nanda Hashe5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2024-04-04vs LCulp/SDeVries (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Sison / Spencer Stoakley vs Ashley Lucas / Kristin Baker4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Purmort / Lauren Spanos vs Kristina Johnson / Anne Morgan6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKara Tringali vs Stacey Valitchka6-2, 6-1
2024-03-21vs ABroemel (Jeff Adams)Split 22
L#1 DoublesDanielle Gier / Sally Licandro vs Golin Kosowitz / Andrea Cowart2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Sison / Spencer Stoakley vs Allison Broemel / Emily Rodgers6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKara Tringali vs Margaret Cart0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Spanos / Allison Purmort vs Marissa Connolly / Sara Ash6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-14vs RBostic/CLogar (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSally Licandro / Danielle Gier vs Pamela Trantham / Tracey Hunt6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKara Tringali vs Rachel Bostic6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Purmort / Lauren Spanos vs Kathy Thompson / Beverly Russo6-0, 6-2
2024-03-07vs JFontaine/TInga (Life Time)Won 20
W#2 DoublesLauren Spanos / Maggie Foscue vs Yesol Kwon / Jessica Zhang6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrittany Baker / Spencer Stoakley vs Tania Inga / Linda Jo Mastrangelo6-2, 6-4
2024-02-29vs VShannon (Raintree)Split 22
L#1 DoublesAllison Purmort / Maggie Foscue vs Caroline Cox / Vicky Shannon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Spanos vs Mindy Zimmerman1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Gier / Sally Licandro vs Kimberly Powell / Angela Thomas6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Meloy / Spencer Stoakley vs Sara Shelor / Alexis Schwartz6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Lauren Spanos
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3
2.95
Kara Tringali
usually #2 Singles 42%, also #1 Singles 42% · published 3
2.94
Danielle Gier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Sally Licandro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Allison Purmort
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.84
Holly Meloy
published
2.79
Spencer Stoakley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.71
Brittany Baker
published 3
2.66
Anna Sison
published 3
2.63
Anna T Heath
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Tringali + Allison Purmort161156% games−0.9% vs expected
Danielle Gier + Sally Licandro232448% games−1.2% vs expected
Allison Purmort + Lauren Spanos9654% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Gier + Allison Purmort3346% gamesnot enough data
Kara Tringali + Spencer Stoakley314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Purmort + Sally Licandro314 matchesnot enough data
Kara Tringali + Lauren Spanos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lauren Spanos
35W–52L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Kara Tringali
75W–66L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Danielle Gier
44W–47L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Sally Licandro
50W–56L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Allison Purmort
58W–73L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Holly Meloy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Spencer Stoakley
28W–62L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brittany Baker
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Anna Sison
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Anna T Heath
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.