Teams

3.0 M Hayes

2022 Team Singles Tournament-GC · Team Singles Tournament-GC Teams

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Team Singles Tournament-GC Teams have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Seth Hester
published
3.42
Nick McGuffee
published
3.38
Michael Chowske
published
3.28
Damien Colbet
published 3.5
Emrik Allen
published 3.5
3.22
Lowell Hayes
published
3.15
Pierce Weatherly
published
Rives Pringle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seth Hester
59W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.64
Nick McGuffee
64W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Michael Chowske
34W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Damien Colbet
70W–58L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Emrik Allen
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lowell Hayes
75W–56L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Pierce Weatherly
24W–26L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Rives Pringle
21W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.