Teams

TCrisp 40+

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-16Split 11
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Emily Kendall1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Leon / Jacqueline Ritchey vs Tiffany Harris / Lizanne Johnson7-6, 6-1
2022-05-09vs IGesher40Lost 12
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Joanna Brooks7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Molly Winstead vs Mollie Hodl / Isabelle Homes Gesher3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Wood / Helen Strickland vs Julia Harris / Alex van Staveren5-7, 3-6
2022-05-03vs RHoldstockLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Adams / Kana Brinckerhoff vs Fran Poole / Jennifer Hogshead4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Ramona Holdstock5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMolly Winstead / Helen Strickland vs Lucy Holding / Elisabeth Sanchez2-6, 3-6
2022-05-02vs JGallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Adams / Kana Brinckerhoff vs Cary Brege / Jenny Nguyen7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Suzanne Schell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Talton / Sandy Wood vs Debi Collins / Brenda Kullick6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-25vs ACARROLLLost 04
L#1 DoublesKim McDonald / Lisa Talton vs Aileen Carroll / Ann Bowler3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Kesah DeLisio4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Poulsen / Danielle Stringer vs Katherine Creedon / Cybele Brockmann4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Winstead / Helen Strickland vs Erin Conigliaro / Michelle Welborn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-04vs DWEILANDWon 20
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Kathryn Beth Beam6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Talton / Sandy Wood vs Leigh Kimball / Jennifer Boyd6-3, 6-2
2022-03-28vs IGesher40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim McDonald / Jacqueline Ritchey vs Leah Ragsdale / Julie Tuttle6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Alex van Staveren7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Sandy Wood vs Mollie Hodl / Kim von Weihe3-6, 4-6
2022-03-21vs JGallagherWon 21
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Jenny Nguyen4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKim McDonald / Lisa Talton vs Karen Thurston / Ruth Smith7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Julie Leon vs Suzanne Schell / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk6-2, 6-3
2022-03-14vs ACARROLLWon 21
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Katherine Creedon7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Adams / Kana Brinckerhoff vs Regina Heroux / Laurie Randall6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDanielle Stringer / Helen Strickland vs Helen Harris / Carolyn Roach2-6, 2-6
2022-03-07vs RHoldstockWon 40
W#1 DoublesKim McDonald / Lisa Talton vs Ramona Holdstock / Elisabeth Sanchez7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Kate Cannon4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Rebecca Sears vs Fran Poole / Lucy Holding3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Winstead / Jacqueline Ritchey vs Melanie Tharrington / Jennifer Hogshead3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Kana Brinckerhoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Nikki DAmbrose
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Talton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Sandy Wood
published
3.51
Theresa Poulsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Rebecca Sears
published
3.48
Jacqueline Ritchey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Helen Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Danielle Stringer
published 3.5
Julie Leon
published
Molly Winstead
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Talton + Nikki DAmbrose2541% gamesnot enough data
Kana Brinckerhoff + Nikki DAmbrose5156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kana Brinckerhoff
238W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Nikki DAmbrose
311W–268L career · 10 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Lisa Talton
120W–112L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Sandy Wood
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Theresa Poulsen
10W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Rebecca Sears
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Jacqueline Ritchey
43W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Helen Strickland
140W–122L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Danielle Stringer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Julie Leon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Winstead
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.