Teams

CM NAVY

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-09vs EM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesPRISCILLA LICHTY / Karen Hansen vs Jennifer Welte / Katie Lindsey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Lichty vs Katy Kappler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rettig / Molly Goldberg vs Theresa Lotspeich / Kesa Sullivan2-6, 5-7
2021-08-26vs VC PINKLost 12
L#1 DoublesPRISCILLA LICHTY / Jessica Johnson vs Kathleen Nisbet / Megan Kane3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Lichty vs Kate Patton7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Rettig / Nicole Anderson vs Traci Samaras / Joanie Mankus0-6, 3-6
2021-08-19vs PTC SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesPRISCILLA LICHTY / Elizabeth Lichty vs Christine Trigg / Caren Swan3-6, 0-6
2021-08-12vs GNO BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesPRISCILLA LICHTY / Karen Hansen vs Taylor Surroz / Meg Braun2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Lichty vs Tonya Fallows6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rettig / Catherine Charles vs Lauren Turra / Jennifer Delaney6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-08-08vs SKY PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine Charles / Karen Hansen vs Amy Raval / Julie Wright0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Lichty vs Lauryn Meyer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-08-05vs WP BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Goldberg / Catherine Charles vs Madeline Hollar / Staci Woolsey3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Catherine Charles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jessica Johnson
published 2.5
2.21
Elizabeth Lichty
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Jennifer Rettig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Anderson
published
PRISCILLA LICHTY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Anderson + Molly Goldberg3243% games+6.4% vs expected
Catherine Charles + Molly Goldberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Catherine Charles
37W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%32%68%
2.56
2.5
Jessica Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Lichty
21W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.21
Jennifer Rettig
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Molly Goldberg
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nicole Anderson
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
PRISCILLA LICHTY
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.