Teams

OB-Keel

2025 Adult 40 & Over Fall Day League - GS · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-04vs GS-OlmstedWon 10
W#3 DoublesFrancis Samios / Angela Hunt vs Deana Crim / Holli Parks5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-28vs GS-OlmstedWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Peterson / Angela Hunt vs Deana Crim / Adrienne Dowhan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-14vs GS-OlmstedLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Hunt / Farrah Keel vs Nicole Olmsted / Tine Buhl2-6, 2-6
2024-10-07vs GS-OlmstedLost 01
L#1 SinglesAngela Hunt vs Sarah Seelhorst1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Debbie Mansell
published 4
3.62
Cheslie Larkin
published 4
3.61
Renee Burroughs
published
3.52
Angela Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.52
Kimberly Barton
published
3.50
Traci Mason
published
3.50
Jana Porter
published
3.49
Jill Middleton
published
3.38
Francis Samios
published
3.37
Cheryl Scarbrough
published 3.5
3.02
Farrah Keel
published
Nicole Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Mansell + Renee Burroughs6160% games+6.9% vs expected
Angela Hunt + Francis Samios3251% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Mansell + Jana Porter404 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Mansell + Jill Middleton314 matchesnot enough data
Jana Porter + Jill Middleton404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Mansell
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Christie Watford-Shannon
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Cheslie Larkin
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Renee Burroughs
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Angela Hunt
59W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Kimberly Barton
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Traci Mason
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jana Porter
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jill Middleton
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Francis Samios
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Scarbrough
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Farrah Keel
5W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Nicole Miller
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.