Teams

Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0W

2024 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-14vs FK - HatfieldWon 20
W#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett vs Nancy Little / Pamela Plumlee6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSherry Ruschell / Terry Shick vs Jan Cole / Donna Jarvis6-3, 6-3
2024-03-06vs FK - HatfieldWon 20
W#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Linda Jones vs Laura Flanagan / Nancy Fetzer6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaryn Dolan / Terry Shick vs Susan Garrick / Donna Jarvis6-2, 6-2
2024-02-29vs FK - HatfieldLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeverly Gates / Terry Shick vs Pamela Plumlee / Kathy Hatfield3-6, 4-6
2024-02-21vs FK - HatfieldLost 01
L#2 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett vs Laura Flanagan / Nancy Fetzer4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-02-07vs FK - HatfieldWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett vs Laura Flanagan / Susan Garrick7-5, 6-0
2024-01-24vs FK - HatfieldWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett vs Pamela Plumlee / Nancy Little6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Yvonne Schappell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Karyn Dolan
published
3.78
Rene Stinnett
published
3.77
Beverly Gates
published 4
3.77
Beth Riendeau
published 4
3.77
Diane Stablein
published 4
Erica Migliorati
published 4
3.71
Linda Jones
published
3.53
Valerie Elvin
published
Linda Brown
published
Patti Hischmann
published
Sherry Ruschell
published
Terry Shick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Elvin + Diane Stablein4163% gamesnot enough data
Terry Shick + Beverly Gates303 matchesnot enough data
Terry Shick + Yvonne Schappell213 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Schappell + Rene Stinnett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yvonne Schappell
131W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
Karyn Dolan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
Rene Stinnett
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Beverly Gates
30W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Beth Riendeau
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Erica Migliorati
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Jones
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Linda Brown
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patti Hischmann
23W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherry Ruschell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Shick
90W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.