Teams

300 - 50 Shades of Pink

2021 Alachua Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-20vs Alachua - Hawk/Shifty 50'sLost 02
L#2 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Sandra Jones vs Raksha Ramkissoon / Tami Armstrong2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSylvia Spear / Amy Feutz vs Marie Trabbic / Amy Whitaker7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-11-17vs Alachua - Hawk/Shifty 50'sLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Feutz / Patricia Woolley vs Tami Armstrong / Genne' DeHenau McDonald4-6, 0-6
2021-11-12vs Alachua - Hawk/Shifty 50'sLost 02
L#2 DoublesIsabel Silver / Helen Ingmarsson vs Cindy McManus / Davette Wycoff2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / Laurie McLaughlin vs Terri Lowery / Genne' DeHenau McDonald1-6, 3-6
2021-10-30vs Alachua - Hawk/Shifty 50'sLost 01
L#1 DoublesRachael Seidler / Christine Gaynor vs Irina Madorsky / Jennine Brandt1-6, 2-6
2021-10-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Patricia Woolley vs Irina Madorsky / Cindy McManus1-6, 1-6
2021-10-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRachael Seidler / Amy Feutz vs Irina Madorsky / Cindy McManus1-6, 1-6
2021-10-09vs Alachua - Hawk/Shifty 50'sLost 01
L#3 DoublesSriyani Dissanayake / Laurie McLaughlin vs Raksha Ramkissoon / Sandra Camin4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Christine Borden
published 3.5
3.14
Laurie McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Helen Ingmarsson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Rachael Seidler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Linda Sheehan
published
2.68
Patricia Woolley
published
2.67
Sriyani Dissanayake
published
2.49
Amy Feutz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Isabel Silver
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Feutz + Laurie McLaughlin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Borden
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Laurie McLaughlin
78W–154L career · 5 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Helen Ingmarsson
42W–46L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–124L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
2.81
Linda Sheehan
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.80
Patricia Woolley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
Sriyani Dissanayake
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Amy Feutz
20W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.49
Isabel Silver
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.