Teams

Wentz/Knoxville

2024 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 Women Combo Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-28vs Kennedy/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Caroline Sullivan vs A Marie Kennedy / Karen Dail1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGina O'Neil / Eileen Webster vs Tammy Simpson / Kelly Hollingsworth6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPamela Shirley / Claudia Stallings vs Lora Armfield / Ann Curtin2-6, 1-6
2024-09-21vs Houck/Knoxville/C55Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGina O'Neil / Sharie Gaby vs Lynn Johnson / Sandy Hodson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinny Davis / Angie Herzog vs Cecilia Lowrey / Stacy Carlson6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Claudia Stallings vs Monica Freeman / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-14vs Knoxville/Campbell/EagenLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Pamela Shirley vs Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick / Joan Ewers1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Herzog / Ginny Davis vs Cindy Henry / Kimberly Morris3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Claudia Stallings vs Ellen Flautt / Michele Hall Craig5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-24vs Kennedy/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesShelly Ren / Gina O'Neil vs Kathleen Zitzman / Mary Ellen Kilburn6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaroline Sullivan / Sheri Kilbey vs Ann Curtin / Christina Johnson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGinny Davis / Deborah Szwarc vs Anita Tisdale / Jennifer Sharp7-6, 6-2
2024-08-17vs Houck/Knoxville/C55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGina O'Neil / Eileen Webster vs Cecilia Lowrey / Stacy Carlson2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Sharie Gaby vs Debbie Shoemaker / Teresa Helton6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLuAnne Zelasko / Helen Ericson vs Monica Freeman / Debi Houck5-7, 1-6
2024-08-10vs Knoxville/Campbell/EagenLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Shirley / Shelly Ren vs Michele Hall Craig / Paige Troutman1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Kilbey / Sharie Gaby vs Tonja Morgan / Ida Randall6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGina O'Neil / Caroline Sullivan vs Sandi Wilson / Kimberly Morris4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Sheri Kilbey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Gina O'Neil
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Ginny Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Pamela Shirley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Angie Herzog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Deborah Szwarc
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Helen Ericson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Shelly Ren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Eileen Webster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
LuAnne Zelasko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Sharie Gaby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Claudia Stallings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Szwarc + Shelly Ren5161% games+10.1% vs expected
Sheri Kilbey + Gina O'Neil9552% games+0.1% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Shelly Ren1540% games−0.4% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Helen Ericson4742% games−2.9% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Deborah Szwarc6941% games−3.4% vs expected
Eileen Webster + Sharie Gaby2446% gamesnot enough data
Angie Herzog + Sheri Kilbey2334% gamesnot enough data
Helen Ericson + Shelly Ren044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Kilbey
51W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Gina O'Neil
41W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Ginny Davis
15W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.45
Pamela Shirley
26W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Angie Herzog
37W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Deborah Szwarc
50W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Helen Ericson
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Shelly Ren
17W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Eileen Webster
19W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
LuAnne Zelasko
3W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sharie Gaby
13W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Claudia Stallings
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.