Teams

Jim Lessley-YTC-Tuesday-FLEX

2025 Auburn Flex League Fall · Tuesday Night FLEX - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-10vs Bret Peterson-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXWon 31
W#1 DoublesJanaki Alavalapati / Robert Scofield vs Bret Peterson / Matt Schneller6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames League / James Lessley vs Lee Bryan / Dan Hart6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoe Wilkinson / Parker van Dyke vs Josh Ehrhorn / Michael Curvey6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#5 DoublesDavid Hester / Kevan Bizilia vs Mark Lovell / Amrut Sadachar1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-12-03vs Bret Peterson-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXWon 32
L#1 DoublesRonnie Forrest / Lamar Daniels vs Grant Kirby / William Heaton0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLamar Daniels III / Scott Wilder vs Amrut Sadachar / Eric Olsen7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKevan Bizilia / David Hester vs Steve Guenther / John Oliver5-7, 3-6
W#4 DoublesJanaki Alavalapati / James Lessley vs Lee Bryan / Matt Schneller6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#5 DoublesMark Murphy / Bob Reynods vs Mark Lovell / Wei Wang4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-12vs Bret Peterson-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXWon 51
W#1 DoublesJames League / Robert Scofield vs Matt Schneller / Bret Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanaki Alavalapati / James Lessley vs Lee Bryan / Dan Hart6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBob Reynods / Zach Walsh vs William Heaton / Amrut Sadachar6-0, 6-1
L#4 DoublesKevan Bizilia / David Hester vs Mark Lovell / Eric Olsen2-6, 2-6
W#5 DoublesMark Murphy / Ronnie Forrest vs John Oliver / Mark Moore7-6, 6-4
W#6 DoublesParker van Dyke / Lamar Daniels III vs Steve Guenther / Michael Curvey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-05vs Bret Peterson-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXWon 60
W#1 DoublesJames Lessley / Robert Scofield vs Matt Schneller / Bret Peterson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJames League / Zach Walsh vs Dan Hart / Lee Bryan7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Murphy / Kevan Bizilia vs Mark Lovell / Amrut Sadachar6-4, 7-5
W#4 DoublesRonnie Forrest / Bob Reynods vs Mark Moore / John Oliver6-1, 7-5
W#5 DoublesLamar Daniels / Scott Wilder vs Steve Guenther / Eric Olsen6-0, 6-4
W#6 DoublesDeming Wang / Hongbiao Wang vs Michael Curvey / Josh Ehrhorn6-2, 6-1
2024-10-29vs Bret Peterson-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXLost 04
L#1 DoublesJanaki Alavalapati / James Lessley vs Bret Peterson / Matt Schneller7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Murphy / Bob Reynods vs George Crandell / Mark Lovell4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesRonnie Forrest / Joe Wilkinson vs Mark Moore / John Oliver4-6, 0-6
L#5 DoublesLamar Daniels / Maddox Daniels vs William Heaton / Wei Wang2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tuesday Night FLEX - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
James League
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
James Lessley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.96
Lamar Daniels III
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #6 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Lamar Daniels
usually #5 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Hongbiao Wang
usually #6 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Deming Wang
usually #6 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bob Reynods
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #5 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Parker van Dyke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #6 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Ronnie Forrest
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Joe Wilkinson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
David Hester
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #5 Doubles 33% · published 3
Janaki Alavalapati
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Kevan Bizilia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #5 Doubles 25% · published
Maddox Daniels
usually #5 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Wilder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #5 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Lessley + Janaki Alavalapati3252% games+16.5% vs expected
Hongbiao Wang + Deming Wang8554% games−3.2% vs expected
Lamar Daniels III + Lamar Daniels314 matchesnot enough data
David Hester + Kevan Bizilia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James League
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
James Lessley
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Lamar Daniels III
21W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Lamar Daniels
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Hongbiao Wang
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Deming Wang
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Bob Reynods
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Parker van Dyke
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Ronnie Forrest
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Joe Wilkinson
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
David Hester
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Janaki Alavalapati
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevan Bizilia
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maddox Daniels
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Scott Wilder
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.