Teams

Team 2 Carvajal

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.32 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-22vs Team 1 StoltzWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Jennifer Eveges vs Heather Viar / Lori Reed6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy McMahon / Amy Bundy vs Kay Bransford / Kerrie Jenkins6-4, 6-6
L#3 DoublesConnie McGowan / Cheryl Driscoll vs Suzanne Stroup / June Wheatley4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Team 3 HaughomWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Jennifer Eveges vs China Fowler / Jennifer Holliday6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLily Riedel / Maria Maebius vs Ronda Estridge / Laura Smith6-4, 5-3
W#3 DoublesAmy McMahon / Amy Bundy vs Erinn Burakow / Sangma MacDougald6-7, 4-2
2025-02-27vs Team 1 StoltzWon 20
W#1 DoublesLily Riedel / Elizabeth Singer vs Annie Richardson / Colleen Stoltz6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJena Olsen / Melissa Sullivan vs Suzanne Stroup / Pilar Falo6-2, 6-1
2025-02-16vs Team 3 HaughomSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Kelly Domson vs Leslie Norwalk / April Pearson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJena Olsen / Amy Bundy vs China Fowler / Jennifer Snyder1-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs Team 1 StoltzWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Blackborow / Jennifer Eveges vs Moo Hackett / Heather Viar6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJena Olsen / Melissa Sullivan vs Annie Richardson / Colleen Stoltz6-7, 4-2
W#3 DoublesLoretta Sevier / Lily Riedel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-02vs Team 3 HaughomLost 02
L#2 DoublesTeresa Nyberg-Grim / Maria Maebius vs Alexei Haughom / Jennifer Holliday4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCandice Rininger / Connie McGowan vs Jennifer Snyder / China Fowler6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-01-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesConnie McGowan / Candice Rininger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-11vs Team 3 HaughomWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Noonan / Lily Riedel vs Jennifer Holliday / Laura Smith6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Singer / Jena Olsen vs China Fowler / Sangma MacDougald6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoretta Sevier / Teresa Nyberg-Grim vs Vanessa Ogilvie / Julie Livingston6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Leah Noonan
published
4.27
Lily Riedel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Maria Maebius
published
Cheryl Driscoll
published 4.5
4.22
Amy McMahon
published 4.5
4.21
Kelly Blackborow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Amy Bundy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Loretta Sevier
published
4.14
Jena Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Kelly Domson
published
4.04
Teresa Nyberg-Grim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Connie McGowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Melissa Sullivan
published
3.88
Candice Rininger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Diane Lewis
published 4
3.22
Wendy Carvajal
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie McGowan + Jena Olsen2346% gamesnot enough data
Connie McGowan + Teresa Nyberg-Grim4155% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Domson + Maria Maebius314 matchesnot enough data
Connie McGowan + Amy Bundy044 matchesnot enough data
Connie McGowan + Amy McMahon134 matchesnot enough data
Lily Riedel + Kelly Blackborow303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Noonan
49W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Lily Riedel
152W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Maria Maebius
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Cheryl Driscoll
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Amy McMahon
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Kelly Blackborow
134W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Amy Bundy
65W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Loretta Sevier
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Jena Olsen
38W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Kelly Domson
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Teresa Nyberg-Grim
87W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Connie McGowan
47W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Melissa Sullivan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.88
4
Candice Rininger
106W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Diane Lewis
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Wendy Carvajal
44W–106L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.