Teams

MAC-Brown/Kim

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.96 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Darci Keljo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Kim Hasle
published 4
3.76
Courtney Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Jeri Finn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Mariko Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Deana Julka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Clarice Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Catherine Go
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Anna Holowetzki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.49
Michelle Posey
published 4
3.46
Jessica Meyer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.46
Dory Simons
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Julie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%95%5%
3.89
4
Kim Hasle
44W–28L career
4%91%5%
3.79
4
Courtney Pierce
28W–24L career
2%97%1%
3.76
4
Jeri Finn
148W–71L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Mariko Clark
2W–6L career
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Deana Julka
69W–28L career
5%95%0%
3.67
4
Clarice Brown
91W–39L career
9%91%0%
3.64
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
15%85%0%
3.59
4
Anna Holowetzki
27W–27L career · type A
16%84%0%
3.58
4
Michelle Posey
76W–43L career
42%58%0%
3.49
4
Jessica Meyer
39W–45L career
45%55%0%
3.46
3.5
Dory Simons
65W–31L career
0%88%12%
3.46
4
Julie Kim
49W–37L career · type A
59%41%0%
3.40

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.