Teams

12 Lakeside Nabors

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Kelly Schuler
published
3.01
Joyce Dustin
published
2.75
Kim Earle
published
2.55
Douglas Morgan
published 2.5
2.50
Ashleigh Witt
published 3
2.23
Christina Saunders
published 2.5
2.21
Autumn Nabors
published 2.5
2.18
Garrett Shifflett
published 2.5
Radcliffe Burt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Schuler
17W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
3.16
Joyce Dustin
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kim Earle
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Douglas Morgan
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%36%64%
2.55
3
Ashleigh Witt
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Christina Saunders
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Autumn Nabors
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Garrett Shifflett
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.18
Radcliffe Burt
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.