Teams

Blossom Live Lob Love

2026 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 Women Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-04-27vs Serve Me a DoubleLost 05
L#1 DoublesLindsay Barton / Zoanne Zapata vs Susan Townsend / Hanh Tran3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Wilkinson vs Patricia Phipps0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Bazley / Rhona Harris vs Elizabeth Fleming / Karen Pozza1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJeanine Acquart vs Bertie Mzyk3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Truesdell / Diana Ponzio vs Sandy Reininger / Marina Henkes2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
ASHLEY JAUREGUI
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Lindsay Barton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Lisa Bazley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Karen Truesdell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Heather Wilkinson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Karin Shaw
published
2.97
Zoanne Zapata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Carol Pichot
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Jeanine Acquart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Miranda Sutin
published
2.67
Danna Halff
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Truesdell + Carol Pichot0614% games−19.9% vs expected
Lindsay Barton + Heather Wilkinson224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Barton + Zoanne Zapata044 matchesnot enough data
Karin Shaw + Zoanne Zapata044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Bazley + Miranda Sutin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ASHLEY JAUREGUI
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Lindsay Barton
26W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lisa Bazley
6W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Karen Truesdell
2W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Heather Wilkinson
33W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Karin Shaw
1W–18L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Zoanne Zapata
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Carol Pichot
0W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Jeanine Acquart
12W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.91
Miranda Sutin
16W–23L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Danna Halff
11W–24L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.