Teams

SOAKS HYLAND

2023 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lola Gomez
published
3.16
Michelle Hyland
published
3.13
Adriana Colliton
published 3
3.13
Allison Nicks
published 3.5
3.08
Marchelli Alcala
published
3.05
Diana Ahmad
published 3
2.85
Jennifer Cottraux
published
2.76
Lara Lucas
published
2.76
Jessica Rueter
published
2.72
Laura Schrengohst
published
2.67
Misha Pfaff
published
2.65
Aimee Plowman
published 3
2.64
Joy Blaha
published
2.42
Lorane Rea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorane Rea + Laura Schrengohst2351% games−5.6% vs expected
Allison Nicks + Lola Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Rueter + Lara Lucas213 matchesnot enough data
Diana Ahmad + Laura Schrengohst033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lola Gomez
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Michelle Hyland
35W–28L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Adriana Colliton
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Allison Nicks
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Cecilia Gallardo Solano
42W–47L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.09
Marchelli Alcala
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Diana Ahmad
34W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
Jennifer Cottraux
20W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Lara Lucas
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Jessica Rueter
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
Laura Schrengohst
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Misha Pfaff
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Aimee Plowman
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
2.65
Joy Blaha
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
Lorane Rea
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.