Teams

GA 8.5W 18 & Over (Richardson)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 8.5 Women (Fair Oaks)

7 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs Team Wood (CONFIRMED)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele McBride / Lynsey Richardson vs Amy Glennon / Elaine Stice6-8
W#2 DoublesVeronica O'Brien / Pam Giddings vs Katherine Wood / Caroline Brashier8-1
L#3 DoublesTine Buhl / Robin Schorr vs Stacey Mays / Laura Baker2-8
2025-08-09vs Team Tara (CONFIRMED)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichele McBride / Lynsey Richardson vs Shanavia Brannam / Tara McGowan8-4
W#2 DoublesVeronica O'Brien / Nicole Olmsted vs Lindsey King / DeAsiah Johnson9-8
W#3 DoublesKelly Richardson / Pam Giddings vs Julia Bolden / Michelle Landry8-3
2025-08-09vs Team McGowan (CONFIRMED)Won 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Richardson / Nicole Olmsted vs Isabelle Coursey / Kyoung Lee2-8
W#2 DoublesPam Giddings / Veronica O'Brien vs Rebecca Cross / Jessica McGowan8-1
W#3 DoublesLynsey Richardson / Michele McBride vs Kelley Weaver / Victoria Brock8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women (Fair Oaks) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Veronica O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.61
Michele McBride
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Robin Schorr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Pam Giddings
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Tine Buhl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Nicole Olmsted
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lynsey Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele McBride + Robin Schorr7072% games+8.6% vs expected
Michele McBride + Veronica O'Brien10068% games+0.7% vs expected
Michele McBride + Lynsey Richardson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica O'Brien
59W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
4.69
Michele McBride
69W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.61
Robin Schorr
51W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Pam Giddings
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Tine Buhl
18W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
Nicole Olmsted
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Lynsey Richardson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.