Teams

Sommerfeldt: Love-All at the Lake

2026 Mixed 55 & Over Invitational · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs Larson: Mac AttackLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarmelo Yasis / Cheryl Yasis vs Jungyong Park / Pam Bowden6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFred Hackstock / Donna Sommerfeldt vs Jeff Fontaine / Judy Haeg1-6, 3-6
2026-08-17vs Alschlager 55 MxWon 21
W#1 DoublesCharles Bombeck / Sarah Watkins vs Lisa Schurch / Mark Alschlager6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFred Hackstock / Cheryl Yasis vs Luanne Kuna / Dan Kuna7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoe Allaben / Deirdre Bombeck vs Bill Sommers / Kathy Sommers4-6, 4-6
2026-08-10vs Ben-NETS 7.0 Mixed (55)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Watkins / Charles Bombeck vs Vicki Bachmann / Paul Bennett1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Sommerfeldt / Fred Hackstock vs Elizabeth Micek / Oscar Oboza6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeirdre Bombeck / Richard Pakonen vs Charlyn Francisco / Jin Chang3-6, 1-6
2026-08-03vs Larson: Mac AttackLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Yasis / Carmelo Yasis vs Tom Larson / Heidi Johnson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Sommerfeldt / Fred Hackstock vs Ann Gabrielli / Scott Lundquist5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charles Bombeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Donna Sommerfeldt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Carmelo Yasis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Cheryl Yasis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Deirdre Bombeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Fred Hackstock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Allaben
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmelo Yasis + Cheryl Yasis2356% gamesnot enough data
Donna Sommerfeldt + Fred Hackstock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Bombeck
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Donna Sommerfeldt
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Carmelo Yasis
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cheryl Yasis
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Deirdre Bombeck
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Fred Hackstock
5W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Joe Allaben
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.