Teams

Transfer/Refund

2024 18&Over Mixed · Refund

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Liam Berkowitz
published
4.25
Mitchell Low
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Emmanuel Sobong
published 4.5
4.17
Katie Figgie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
David Zemel
published 4
Cheryl Orifici
published 4
3.66
Andrew Snell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Kate Mitchell
published
3.31
Katie Sweeney
published 3.5
3.26
Jennifer Golden
published 3.5
3.21
Zach Messner
published
2.86
Scott McHugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Jennifer Messner
published
Kevin Dupont
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Figgie + Mitchell Low6650% games−5.7% vs expected
Jennifer Messner + Zach Messner4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liam Berkowitz
26W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Mitchell Low
276W–157L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Emmanuel Sobong
75W–53L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
Katie Figgie
100W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
4
David Zemel
60W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Cheryl Orifici
35W–37L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andrew Snell
88W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
Kate Mitchell
89W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Katie Sweeney
82W–43L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jennifer Golden
143W–98L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Zach Messner
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Scott McHugh
114W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jennifer Messner
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%88%12%
2.35
Kevin Dupont
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.