Teams

Duval/McGehee/TriLevel5.0W

2024 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Summer · 5.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-03vs EganLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia McGehee / Anne Billion vs Sarah-Lynn le Roux / Joan Whelan1-6, 3-6
2024-10-27vs EganSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnne Billion / Paula Miller vs Meredith Frisch / Alexis Schuchart7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Atkins / Ellen Dyal vs Jacqueline Bell Egan / Joann Welborn6-3, 6-4
2024-10-20vs EganSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMelissa Glasgow / Anne Billion vs Jacqueline Bell Egan / Heather LaPrade6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNatasha Senchuk / Lesley Williams vs Joann Welborn / Jennifer Cleek6-7, 4-6
2024-09-29vs EganLost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Dyal / Kelly Atkins vs Heather LaPrade / Addison Crenshaw5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-22vs EganWon 10
W#3 DoublesNatasha Senchuk / Stephanie Vihlen vs Joann Welborn / Jennifer Cleek3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-15vs EganLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Bush / Anne Billion vs Jill Saig / Meredith Frisch3-6, 0-6
2024-08-18vs EganWon 10
W#3 DoublesEllen Dyal / Lesley Williams vs Heather LaPrade / Jacqueline Bell Egan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cary MacRae
published 5
4.47
Melissa Glasgow
published
4.38
Cynthia McGehee
published 4.5
4.32
Mary Bush
published
4.20
Anne Billion
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.06
Jessica Cummings
published
4.04
Stephanie Vihlen
published
3.96
Natasha Senchuk
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Lesley Williams
published
3.85
Kristen Surface
published
3.79
Kelly Atkins
published
3.77
Ellen Dyal
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia McGehee + Natasha Senchuk4166% games+7.6% vs expected
Cynthia McGehee + Anne Billion8455% games−10.8% vs expected
Anne Billion + Ellen Dyal134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cary MacRae
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Glasgow
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
4.47
4.5
Cynthia McGehee
35W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.38
Mary Bush
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Anne Billion
110W–84L career · 9 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
Jessica Cummings
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Stephanie Vihlen
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Natasha Senchuk
73W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
Lesley Williams
41W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.86
Kristen Surface
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.85
Kelly Atkins
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4.5
Ellen Dyal
69W–58L career · 7 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.