Teams

Different Strokes

2023 Prince Georges Tri-Level 18 & Over · Prince George's Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-19vs Double the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaticia Jefferson / Keyona Bell vs Karen Francis / Sarah Milsom3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-12vs LoVV Mid-TriSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaticia Jefferson / Laila Cofield vs Tynika Wilson / Karyn ODonnell5-7, 3-2
W#3 DoublesStaci Steward / Grace Gourdine vs Constance Manning / Sheila Jennings2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-11-11vs LoVV Mid-TriLost 01
L#3 DoublesStaci Steward / Venita Cooper vs Constance Manning / Sheila Jennings5-7, 4-6
2023-11-11vs SpinderellasWon 10
W#2 DoublesStaci Steward / Colleen Quinlan vs Gale Powell / Gwendolyn Vauss7-5, 6-2
2023-11-05vs LoVV Lo-TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesTamara Davis / Staci Steward vs Sarah Shomstein / Bernadette Walker0-6, 2-6
2023-10-29vs Double the FunSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaticia Jefferson / Valerie Stoehr vs Alexis McCary / Cora Ho3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarthy Boston / Cynthia Clinton Brown vs Anjali Garg / Hannah Yoo6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-10-28vs Net GirlzWon 20
W#2 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Rebecca Sellassie vs Telores Hill / Khanh Le1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Reid / Staci Steward vs Beverly Rouse / Natalie Anderson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-09vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesStaci Steward / Naomi Hall vs Emily Schabacker / Anna-Karina Caudevilla7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-08vs Net GirlzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaticia Jefferson / Karolyn Clarke vs Michelle Moore / Claris Brock4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Reid / Staci Steward vs Katina Linkins / Natalie Anderson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince George's Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Keyona Bell
published
3.63
Laticia Jefferson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Arial Pegues
published 4
3.30
Cynthia Clinton Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carrie Anderson
published 3.5
Carthy Boston
published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
3.08
Marsha Williams
published
2.74
Staci Steward
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.68
Venita Cooper
published
2.60
Stephanie Marshall
published
Karolyn Clarke
published
Laila Cofield
published
Valerie Stoehr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venita Cooper + Stephanie Marshall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keyona Bell
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.65
4
Laticia Jefferson
12W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Arial Pegues
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cynthia Clinton Brown
117W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Carrie Anderson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carthy Boston
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Sellassie
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Marsha Williams
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Diana Williams Gibau
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Staci Steward
120W–166L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Venita Cooper
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Stephanie Marshall
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Karolyn Clarke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laila Cofield
28W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Stoehr
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.