Teams

GAC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-02vs WC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Garrobo / Jerry Augustin vs Robert Murphy / Aaron Muhl6-1, 6-1
2024-08-26vs HFII REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Dodds / Andy Garrobo vs Josh Haynes / Bill Case5-7, 5-7
2024-08-21vs HV BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndy Garrobo / Allan Hoover vs Alejo Marugan / Alex Purchase6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrian Raemer vs Tim Boyer6-1, 6-1
2024-08-19vs FOX BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJerry Augustin / Brian Raemer vs Scott Kerr / Lyle Olson4-6, 5-7
2024-08-12vs HG GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Augustin / John Adam Killian vs Paul Karlsgodt / Jeremy Roberts6-3, 6-2
2024-07-29vs HW GOLDLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrian Raemer vs Robert George3-6, 1-6
2024-07-22vs LTFC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJerry Augustin / Ben Dannenberg vs Lael Fray / Nathan Raper1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Dodds / Andy Garrobo vs Michael Detampel / James DeLurgio6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Ben Dannenberg
published 3.5
3.17
Allan Hoover
published 3
3.14
Eric Edwards
published
3.08
Andy Garrobo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
John Adam Killian
published
3.01
Jim Lord
published
3.01
Jerry Augustin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Brian Raemer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Michael Dodds
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Garrobo + Jerry Augustin26962% games+2.1% vs expected
Brian Raemer + Andy Garrobo6257% games−2.3% vs expected
Brian Raemer + Jerry Augustin3256% gamesnot enough data
Eric Edwards + Jim Lord314 matchesnot enough data
Allan Hoover + Jim Lord213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Dannenberg
24W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Allan Hoover
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.17
Eric Edwards
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3
Andy Garrobo
65W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
John Adam Killian
29W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.02
Jim Lord
35W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Jerry Augustin
78W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Brian Raemer
46W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Michael Dodds
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.