← Teams

MAC-Henderson

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.9 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
James Hockley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
William Hergenhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
James Ringelberg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.61
Donald Brenneman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Todd Eckelman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Thomas Turnbull
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Barg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Bill Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2021-11-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJohn Hall / William Hergenhan vs Bill Rhoades / Ken Ackerman7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Eckelman / James Ringelberg vs John van Leeuwen / Patrick Trank7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonald Brenneman / James Hockley vs Mike Mullen / Lance Campbell7-5, 6-3
2021-10-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Hall / William Hergenhan vs Rick Wong / John Major6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Thomas Turnbull vs Floyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid White / Zachary Wright vs Edwin Becker / Gary Willihnganz7-5, 6-2
2021-10-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJonathan Barg / Todd Eckelman vs Murray Jansen / Michael Jansen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDonald Brenneman / Jeffrey Krum vs Doug Matheson / Matt Bolte6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Campbell / Rudy Martinez vs Chuck Yett / Dean Waters6-2, 6-4
2021-10-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hergenhan / John Hall vs Neil Soiffer / Peter Schulte6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonald Brenneman / Jeffrey Krum vs Michael Kazangian / John Wallin6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Rudy Martinez vs Jim Hopkins / Dean Gaylor7-6, 6-3
2021-09-26Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Thomas Turnbull vs Bruce Yang / Vincent Robertson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Hall / James Hockley vs Dave Vinik / Robert Ferek6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam Campbell / Todd Eckelman vs Jim Wheeler / Scott Anderson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-09-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDonald Brenneman / William Campbell vs Russ DeMoss / Carlin Jackson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Thomas Turnbull vs Lance Berkey / Craig Mills3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTodd Eckelman / Jonathan Barg vs Anthony Valenzuela / Paul Garry7-6, 6-4
2021-09-11Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Campbell / Donald Brenneman vs Terence Gariety / William Malloch6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid White / Zachary Wright vs Joe Entler / Ken Nichols7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
James Hockley
31W–23L career · type S
not enough data
—
4
William Hergenhan
56W–42L career
7%91%1%
3.71
4
James Ringelberg
73W–77L career
8%92%0%
3.63
4
Donald Brenneman
44W–55L career
16%84%0%
3.61
4
Todd Eckelman
33W–36L career
21%79%0%
3.58
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
16%84%0%
3.57
4
Jonathan Barg
24W–43L career
29%71%0%
3.54
4
Bill Henderson
108W–120L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.