Teams

Penny & the Jets!

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-07vs AK-TAC-WyzykowskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Thomas / Victoria Yu vs Christie Wyzykowski / Susan Brunner3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Sedwick / Dianne Alger vs Cynthia Henie / Song Bliss4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-11-18vs AK-TAC-WyzykowskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Dianne Alger vs Kathy McArthur / Susan Brunner1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Thomas / Deborah Svendsen vs Conita Mullett / Song Bliss3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherry Sedwick / Bernie Ruskin vs Christie Wyzykowski / Nina Brudie6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-04vs AK-TAC-WyzykowskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Sedwick / Lynn Thomas vs Conita Mullett / Kathy McArthur6-3, 3-3
L#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Bernie Ruskin vs Cynthia Henie / Song Bliss4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Svendsen / Dianne Alger vs Christie Wyzykowski / Nina Brudie2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs AK-TAC-WyzykowskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Deborah Svendsen vs Christie Wyzykowski / Conita Mullett6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana Griffin / Victoria Yu vs Kathy McArthur / Song Bliss6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Thomas / Sherry Sedwick vs Cynthia Henie / Nina Brudie6-4, 6-3
2025-10-21vs AK-TAC-WyzykowskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesVictoria Yu / Dana Griffin vs Susan Brunner / Conita Mullett2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Thomas / Deborah Svendsen vs Cynthia Henie / Cecilia Hopper2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Bernie Ruskin vs Christie Wyzykowski / Kathy McArthur0-6, 4-6
2025-10-05vs AK-TAC-WyzykowskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesBernie Ruskin / Deborah Svendsen vs Cecilia Hopper / Cynthia Henie0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Yu / Dana Griffin vs Conita Mullett / Susan Brunner1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSherry Sedwick / Lynn Thomas vs Song Bliss / Kathy McArthur6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Dana Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Sherry Sedwick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Penny Rohacek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Victoria Yu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Deborah Svendsen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.41
Dianne Alger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.09
Bernie Ruskin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Lynn Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernie Ruskin + Dianne Alger1521% gamesnot enough data
Dana Griffin + Victoria Yu123 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Thomas + Sherry Sedwick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Griffin
111W–86L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Sherry Sedwick
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Penny Rohacek
49W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Victoria Yu
37W–26L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Deborah Svendsen
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
3
Dianne Alger
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Bernie Ruskin
2W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Lynn Thomas
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.