Teams

JTC Lancaster

2025 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-06vs JTC - ZaldivarLost 02
L#1 DoublesErik Schmidt / Rachael Seidler vs Pranav Gupta / Laurie McLaughlin1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Michelle Burns vs Scott Wright / Melinda Hartline1-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs JTC JohnsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErik Schmidt / Rachael Seidler vs Jorg Bungert / Norma Banes6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Michelle Burns vs Christa Arnold / J Brad Case2-6, 0-6
2025-03-01vs JTC Booth 7.0 SmashersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Schmidt / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Nicole Millsaps / Stefan Gerber2-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs JTC - ZaldivarLost 01
L#3 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Rachael Seidler vs Anchalee Phataralaoha / Christopher Bumgarner6-7, 1-6
2025-01-26vs DB - IeiriLost 01
L#2 DoublesBlythe Karow / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Irina Madorsky / Scott Travis1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Erik Schmidt
published
3.17
Lawrence Hooghuis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Burns
published
2.80
Rachael Seidler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Blythe Karow
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Tiffany Schmidt
published
2.60
Gregg Fissenden
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.58
Philip Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Michaela Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Lancaster + Rachael Seidler7549% gamesnot enough data
Philip Lancaster + Blythe Karow3740% gamesnot enough data
Blythe Karow + Gregg Fissenden134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erik Schmidt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Lawrence Hooghuis
53W–134L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Michelle Burns
26W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–122L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Blythe Karow
45W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Tiffany Schmidt
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Gregg Fissenden
24W–83L career · 9 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Philip Lancaster
90W–227L career · 7 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Michaela Hogan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.