Teams

BHSC- Bouton

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-15vs Farmington- CravenLost 02
L#1 SinglesSherry Lake vs Gina Hogue0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMonica Prichard vs Jeanette Wang6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-07vs Farmington- CravenLost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Chang vs Caroline Childers5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-24vs Christianson - ACAC RaqueteersWon 10
W#2 SinglesLisa Chang vs Lisa Christianson6-2, 6-3
2025-09-23vs Farmington- CravenWon 20
W#1 SinglesDiana Whitten vs Kristina Loftus6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmy Bouton vs Lauren Holzman6-0, 6-2
2025-09-03vs Farmington- CravenWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Chang vs Courtney Sievers6-3, 6-0
2025-08-26vs Christianson - ACAC RaqueteersWon 10
W#2 SinglesLisa Chang vs Lisa Christianson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Diana Whitten
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Lisa Chang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
Katherine Mcnerney
published
2.54
Amy Bouton
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.51
Monica Prichard
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.47
Esther Bobbin
published 2.5
2.40
Kathryn Harris
published
2.24
Sherry Lake
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Whitten
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Lisa Chang
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.63
Katherine Mcnerney
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%33%67%
2.56
2.5
Amy Bouton
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Monica Prichard
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Esther Bobbin
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Kathryn Harris
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Sherry Lake
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.