Teams

LATA40/Kleemoff/LCTC

2026 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
Sep 23 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Country Club of Lexington
2026-08-26vs LATA40/RANGEL/CAMPLost 12
W#1 DoublesRita Squires / Corrina Kleemoff vs Leslie Downs / Courtney Nicholson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Caruso / Denise Holmes vs Sally Keiper / Traci Gilden4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCecilia Nilsson / Lorri Cold vs Jane Rangel / Jennifer Wild3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-19vs LATA40/Henderson/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Turpin / Lori Yuris vs Ashley Pender / Kelly Delk3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Holmes / Tonya Swalgren vs Christina Kaye Huff / Page Edwards3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRita Squires / Lorri Cold vs Aubrey Hutto / Robin Ray2-6, 2-6
2026-08-12vs LATA40-Taylor-SSPLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Gee / Betty Joyce vs Sara Marrello / Kelly Berryhill0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Caruso / Denise Holmes vs Annette McCaffrey / Rebecca Coleman6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Turpin / Lori Yuris vs Jane Roberts / Debe Hanners7-6, 6-4
2026-08-10vs LATA/REAM/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Holmes / Rita Squires vs Anne Blackmon / Tina Saxon1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmanda Turpin / Lorri Cold vs Maureen Swindall / Missy Graczyk2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Gee / Betty Joyce vs Cindy Bane / Louise Burpee1-6, 1-6
2026-07-22vs LATA40/RANGEL/CAMPWon 21
W#1 DoublesCorrina Kleemoff / Amanda Turpin vs Susan Mathews / Sarah Zupon6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Caruso / Denise Holmes vs Nancy Butts Foy / Traci Gilden1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCecilia Nilsson / Lori Yuris vs Jennifer Wild / Debra Sklar6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Adult Women - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA/REAM/CAMP40102882
2LATA40-Taylor-SSP31841196
3LATA40/Henderson/LCC136613106
4LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP133918121
5LATA40/Kleemoff/LCTC133918130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Amanda Turpin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Betty Joyce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Cecilia Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Corrina Kleemoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Debbie Gee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Rita Squires
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Denise Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Lori Yuris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Tonya Swalgren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Lorri Cold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Turpin + Corrina Kleemoff5746% games+6.6% vs expected
Tonya Swalgren + Denise Holmes10357% games+5.1% vs expected
Lori Yuris + Cecilia Nilsson5455% games+2.7% vs expected
Denise Holmes + Karen Caruso033 matchesnot enough data
Lori Yuris + Lorri Cold303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Turpin
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Betty Joyce
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Cecilia Nilsson
43W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Corrina Kleemoff
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Debbie Gee
34W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Rita Squires
29W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Denise Holmes
20W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Lori Yuris
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Tonya Swalgren
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Lorri Cold
23W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Karen Caruso
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.