← Teams

GLVR-Ferrer/Jarvis 8.0

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kevin Jarvis
published 4.5
4.13
Sarah Ferrer
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 4.5
4.12
Cassia Carpio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.07
Ellen Mader
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Tarynn Berkman
published 4.5
4.05
Mary Green-Zwemke
published 4.5
4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.82
William Creger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.49
Angelina Warriner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Results8 ties
2022-11-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKe Ounaphom / Angelina Warriner vs Chris Collins / JENNIFER BELOY7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Dan Tracy vs Jennifer Simmons / David Greenberg6-4, 7-5
2022-11-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Dan Tracy vs Ren Toshié Miura / Roshen Warrier6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Creger / Mary Green-Zwemke vs Derek Carlson / Michiko Hunter6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Amy Bucher vs Wenyan Li / Coral Nash6-0, 6-0
2022-10-28Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Cassia Carpio vs Alix Edwards / Michael Chang6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Nick Hooker vs Raini Spitze / Jason Hyde6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAngelina Warriner / Ke Ounaphom vs Honorato Wenceslao / Christina Wright7-6, 6-2
2022-10-26Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Nick Hooker vs Kelly Bartlett / Mitchell Miyashiro6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCassia Carpio / Kevin Jarvis vs Jonathan Quon / Karen Groenweghe6-3, 6-2
2022-10-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / Sarah Ferrer vs Kaytlynn Kolb / Cord Speelman6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesWilliam Creger / Ellen Mader vs Theresa Mallari / Minh Nguyen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Bucher / Kevin Jarvis vs Jacob Buckley / Krista Mikalatos6-4, 6-2
2022-10-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSarah Ferrer / Nick Hooker vs Cindy del Rosario / Mingyang Liu7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWilliam Creger / Ellen Mader vs Jonathan Hong / Leah Buxman6-3, 7-5
2022-09-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTarynn Berkman / William Creger vs Brian Hendrickson / Tara Hendrickson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Amy Bucher vs Deborah Naugler / Cameron Mitchell6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCassia Carpio / Thomas Walker vs Rebecca Martinez Griffin / Mark King6-3, 7-5
2022-09-11Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesWilliam Creger / Tarynn Berkman vs Bao Bui / Brianna Hill6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Walker / Cassia Carpio vs Aidan Lee / Emilee Plank6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kevin Jarvis
31W–3L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Sarah Ferrer
145W–57L career
1%99%0%
4.13
4.5
Cassia Carpio
256W–91L career
2%98%0%
4.12
4.5
Ellen Mader
97W–47L career
5%95%0%
4.07
4.5
Tarynn Berkman
78W–28L career
7%93%0%
4.05
4.5
Mary Green-Zwemke
79W–32L career
7%93%0%
4.05
4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
William Creger
71W–41L career
1%96%3%
3.82
4
Angelina Warriner
91W–55L career
37%63%0%
3.49

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.