Teams

LATA18/Bailey/LCTC

2026 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-13vs LATA18/Stewart/SSPLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatty Spires / Elizabeth Regan vs Lydia Salais / Sarah Mayle4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Bailey / Kris Davis vs Zeel Hiren Patel Welch / Debra Krotish4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Spencer Muncy / Jennifer Winchester vs Sydney Plowman / Adrienne Wright4-6, 2-6
2026-07-30vs LATA18/Squires/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Davis / Anne Spencer Muncy vs Janet Buhrow / Hannah Pittman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Bailey / Torry Dickey vs Cindy Mills / Meredith Hooper7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLindsay Copelan / Janis Caccamise vs Carmen Goulet / Melissa Hayden6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Patty Spires
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Elizabeth Regan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Janis Caccamise
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Torry Dickey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Anne Spencer Muncy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Jennifer Winchester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Lindsay Copelan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Assatta Herbert
published 3
2.47
Kelly Glynn
published
2.46
Kris Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janis Caccamise + Kelly Glynn3258% games+15.9% vs expected
Jennifer Winchester + Kris Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Copelan + Kelly Glynn134 matchesnot enough data
Torry Dickey + Patty Spires303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Winchester + Lindsay Copelan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patty Spires
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Elizabeth Regan
48W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Janis Caccamise
46W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Torry Dickey
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Anne Spencer Muncy
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jennifer Winchester
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Lindsay Copelan
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Assatta Herbert
22W–33L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kelly Glynn
27W–47L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Kris Davis
42W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.