Teams

Adult Women Night

2026 BR HOLD Teams · 55 & Over HOLD TEAMS

12 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · 55 & Over HOLD TEAMS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Adult Women Night000000
2Adult Women Day000000
3Tri Level Women Day000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Michelle St Martin
published
3.62
Lisa Scalise
published
3.52
Heather Jayson
published
3.50
Jayne Anderson
published
3.42
Patti Hiller
published
3.28
Sydney Braud
published
3.17
Fiona Conroy
published
3.08
Kelley Thompson
published
3.06
Lilibeth Pongyan
published
2.85
Loren Brown
published
2.66
Monica Heitman
published
Lee Anne Tranchina
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Scalise + Heather Jayson6447% games−2.7% vs expected
Sydney Braud + Kelley Thompson3447% games−5.1% vs expected
Lee Anne Tranchina + Heather Jayson224 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Thompson + Monica Heitman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle St Martin
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Lisa Scalise
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Heather Jayson
30W–36L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.52
Jayne Anderson
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Patti Hiller
8W–24L career · no lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Sydney Braud
18W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Fiona Conroy
13W–17L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Kelley Thompson
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Lilibeth Pongyan
18W–29L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Loren Brown
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.85
Monica Heitman
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Lee Anne Tranchina
6W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.