Teams

Thomas/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-23vs Bell/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Johnson / Kevin Womack vs Freddy Ojeda / Andrew Dudas4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRobert Rubin / Elliot Wender vs Alfredo Ale / Jonathan Laman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Daniel Forbes
published 4
3.74
Robert Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kevin Womack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Hunter Ivy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.22
Wade Hodge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Jeremy Huelin
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.84
Ross Nazari
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Elliot Wender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Paxton
published
Saarth Bhanot
published
Samuel Hardiman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Forbes
18W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Robert Rubin
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Kevin Womack
22W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Hunter Ivy
7W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Wade Hodge
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jeremy Huelin
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Ross Nazari
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Elliot Wender
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Josh Paxton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Saarth Bhanot
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Hardiman
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.