Teams

DC Tennis Club

2023 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. 40 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18vs Gut InstinctLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Hill / Nadia Asancheyev vs Sally Bailey / Gay Trinkner2-6, 0-6
2023-03-11vs Havin FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Amy Clement vs Susan Cole / Kylie Gaskins6-1, 6-4
2023-03-04vs Piney RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Cara Camacho vs Wendy Harman / Chelbe Williams7-5, 2-0
2023-02-25vs Gut InstinctWon 10
W#2 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Meaghan Davant vs Nancy Perkins / Janice Zima5-7, 3-1
2023-02-11vs Piney RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Cara Camacho vs OLUSEYI GEORGE / Wendy Harman6-3, 3-3
2023-01-21vs Piney RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Nathalie Ryan vs Chelbe Williams / Gail Taylor1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kelly Kennedy
published
2.81
Meghan Metzbower
published
2.78
Nadia Asancheyev
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Megan Shapiro
published
2.27
Jennifer Wine
published
Nancy Lutz
published
Stephanie Denton
published
Victoria Potter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wine + Meghan Metzbower6262% games+9.0% vs expected
Meghan Metzbower + Megan Shapiro5451% games+6.4% vs expected
Nancy Lutz + Jennifer Wine123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Lutz + Meghan Metzbower303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Kennedy
71W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Meghan Metzbower
26W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Nadia Asancheyev
29W–26L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Megan Shapiro
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jennifer Wine
27W–24L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Elizabeth Richardson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Lutz
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Denton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Potter
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.