Teams

SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.96 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Michelle McGill vs Jacki Joseph / Jeanette Shepard5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichelle McGill vs Marcela Pomadoro4-6, 3-6
2026-06-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle McGill / Valerie Blackhurst vs Alena Taylor / Sarah Law6-0, 6-3
2026-06-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesShelli Johnston / Michelle McGill vs Lauren Annunziata / Mary Diaz Gordon6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.77
Lisa Mayberry
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.77
Athelia Graham
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Kim Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Michelle Ainge
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.69
Kimberly Mayfield
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.63
Jill Ford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Andrea Smith
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Ashlee Chappell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.60
Michelle McGill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Kimberlie Bayne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Shelli Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford5156% games+11.9% vs expected
Tena Maughan + Andrea Smith3360% games+8.6% vs expected
Kimberly Mayfield + Shelli Johnston4161% games+7.9% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.2% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Kim Santiago7164% games+5.0% vs expected
Kimberly Mayfield + Kim Santiago18754% games+4.6% vs expected
Andrea Smith + Shelli Johnston10752% games+4.3% vs expected
Tena Maughan + Michelle Ainge7954% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Belinda Jensen
147W–92L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
Lisa Mayberry
81W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Athelia Graham
58W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kim Santiago
154W–86L career · 12 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Michelle Ainge
54W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Kimberly Mayfield
65W–38L career · 12 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
134W–64L career · 9 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Jill Ford
85W–63L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Andrea Smith
76W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Ashlee Chappell
89W–30L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
Michelle McGill
56W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Kimberlie Bayne
96W–123L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Brenda Fowler
88W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Halli Craft
63W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.