Teams

WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men NEL GBTC Brodhagen

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 2.88 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJack Palasota / Brian Anderson vs Zachary Werner / Karthick Muthaiyan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Brodhagen / Blaine Springer vs Jonathan Paque / Michael Campbell6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesThomas Brodhagen / Brian Anderson vs Zachary Werner / Scott Springmier0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlaine Springer / Patrick Mileski vs Michael Campbell / Steve Hale3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBlaine Springer / Glen Sherman vs Mitch Kroll / Scott Springmier6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Brodhagen / Patrick Mileski vs Michael Campbell / Karthick Muthaiyan4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBrandon Jonen / Glen Sherman vs Steve Hale / Mitch Kroll4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesThomas Brodhagen vs Jonathan Paque2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJack Palasota / Brian Anderson vs Michael Campbell / Zachary Werner6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesBlaine Springer / Patrick Mileski vs Steve Hale / Zachary Werner0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesThomas Brodhagen vs Jonathan Paque0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGlen Sherman / Jack Palasota vs Karthick Muthaiyan / Mitch Kroll4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesBlaine Springer / Thomas Brodhagen vs Steve Hale / Scott Springmier1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJack Palasota / Ravi Kiran Kadipi Reddy vs Zachary Werner / Mitch Kroll1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men NEL OgdenYMCA Hale6014412134
2WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men NEL GBTC Brodhagen0631530185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Brandon Jonen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Glen Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Blaine Springer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.59
Jack Palasota
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.28
Thomas Brodhagen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Sherman + Brandon Jonen1634% games−9.3% vs expected
Thomas Brodhagen + Jack Palasota134 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Brodhagen + Brandon Jonen033 matchesnot enough data
Jack Palasota + Glen Sherman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandon Jonen
60W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Glen Sherman
45W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
Blaine Springer
10W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.65
3
Jack Palasota
26W–52L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Thomas Brodhagen
13W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.